2000
DOI: 10.1007/bf03218215
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical value of pleural lavage cytological positivity in lung cancer patients without intraoperative malignant pleuritis

Abstract: The semiquantitative evaluation of tumor cell clusters in pleural lavage cytology-positive patients provided useful information on postoperative recurrence. Since Type III patients are at high-risk for pleural recurrence, postoperative therapy targeting local control should be conducted in such patients.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…After independent review, 24 publications dealing with prognostic value of PLC in patients with lung cancer were considered to be eligible for inclusion in the analysis . Of these publications, one was excluded because it did not allow the calculation of HR [26], four were excluded because no survival data in negative PLC group were available [6,[27][28][29], three were excluded because the same authors published several reports on the same patients, and only the best-quality study was considered [30][31][32], three were excluded because they did not provide sufficient data to perform a quantitative aggregation [5,33,34]. Subsequently, 15 articles [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25] were available for analysis of the PLC prognostic significance; the clinical characteristics of these studies, along with ELCWP scores, are outlined in Table 1, and the ELCWP scores in detail are shown in Appendix Table 1 (provided in supplemental material on the Web).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After independent review, 24 publications dealing with prognostic value of PLC in patients with lung cancer were considered to be eligible for inclusion in the analysis . Of these publications, one was excluded because it did not allow the calculation of HR [26], four were excluded because no survival data in negative PLC group were available [6,[27][28][29], three were excluded because the same authors published several reports on the same patients, and only the best-quality study was considered [30][31][32], three were excluded because they did not provide sufficient data to perform a quantitative aggregation [5,33,34]. Subsequently, 15 articles [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25] were available for analysis of the PLC prognostic significance; the clinical characteristics of these studies, along with ELCWP scores, are outlined in Table 1, and the ELCWP scores in detail are shown in Appendix Table 1 (provided in supplemental material on the Web).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patients in whom pleural dissemination or malignant effusion was intraoperatively found were excluded from the present analysis. Some of the present tested patients were included in the previously reported studies [9,10].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The method of PLC immediately after thoracotomy was previously described [9,10]. Briefly, the pleural cavity was washed with about 200 ml of physiological saline solution, most of which was then collected into a glass bottle with a mixture of heparin.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations