2004
DOI: 10.1300/j029v14n02_02
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical Variations of Adolescent Substance Abuse: An Empirically Based Typology

Abstract: ABSTRACT. This study was designed to establish and validate a multidimensional empirically based typology of clinically referred adolescent substance abusers. A total of 141 adolescent substance abusers, most of whom were male, African-American, and juvenile justice involved, comprised the study sample. Youth and their parents completed comprehensive assessments at intake to treatment, discharge, and at 6 months and 12 months post-discharge from treatment. Adolescents were classified based on individual and fa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, descriptive profiles of modifiable psychosocial characteristics (e.g., alcohol-sex outcome expectancies, condom use self-efficacy) and sexual risk behaviors were constructed across cluster membership to improve current understanding of relations between patterns of psychiatric symptoms and proximal risk and protective factors for HIV/STI exposure. The use of cluster analysis with the current sample resulted in the documentation of significant heterogeneity in psy-chiatric symptoms, similar to previous studies employing this analytic strategy with samples of multiproblem youth (e.g., Houck et al, 2006;Potter & Jenson, 2003;Rowe, Liddle, Caruso, & Dakof, 2004;Stewart & Trupin, 2003). In addition, significant relations between multivariate patterns of psychiatric symptoms and participation in specific indices of SRB replicate findings in other community and clinical samples of stigmatized adolescents and adults (e.g., Brown et al, 1997;McClelland, Teplin, Abram, & Jacobs, 2002;Rothenberg et al, 2007;Tubman et al, 2003).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Second, descriptive profiles of modifiable psychosocial characteristics (e.g., alcohol-sex outcome expectancies, condom use self-efficacy) and sexual risk behaviors were constructed across cluster membership to improve current understanding of relations between patterns of psychiatric symptoms and proximal risk and protective factors for HIV/STI exposure. The use of cluster analysis with the current sample resulted in the documentation of significant heterogeneity in psy-chiatric symptoms, similar to previous studies employing this analytic strategy with samples of multiproblem youth (e.g., Houck et al, 2006;Potter & Jenson, 2003;Rowe, Liddle, Caruso, & Dakof, 2004;Stewart & Trupin, 2003). In addition, significant relations between multivariate patterns of psychiatric symptoms and participation in specific indices of SRB replicate findings in other community and clinical samples of stigmatized adolescents and adults (e.g., Brown et al, 1997;McClelland, Teplin, Abram, & Jacobs, 2002;Rothenberg et al, 2007;Tubman et al, 2003).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Past typologies have generally found three or four cannabis users categories ( 5 8 ). However, some of these often relied on clinical samples ( 40 ) or adult population ( 5 ), whereas the current study examines a normative population of adolescents. As in other typologies, we found early and late onset classes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Four groups were identified: Non-problematic (59.2%); primary alcohol use disorders (14.4%); delinquent cannabis/alcohol DSM-IV-abuse (17.9%); and CUD with multiple problems (8.5%). Another cross-sectional study used cluster analysis on a clinical sample of mostly juvenile justice involved adolescents who sought drug abuse treatment ( 40 ). They identified three groups based on individual and family risk factors, associated problems, and severity of substance use: Juvenile Justice Involved Substance Abusers (41%, lowest level of risk but highest juvenile justice involvement); Comorbid Substance Abusers (33%, greatest family risk and individual psychopathology); and Heavy Substance Abusers (26%, serious substance abuse and peer substance use).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As the previous statement suggests, use severity is commonly captured by continuous measures of the frequency and amount of substance use, with higher values indicating greater severity (see for example the National Survey on Drug Use and Health, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, 2005; and the Monitoring the Future survey, Johnston et al, 2005). However, experimental adolescent users are also distinguished from more severe users in that they have fewer chronic problems and fewer risk factors, such as less access to drugs and less or no family dysfunction, and their problem behavior is short term-that is, it tends not to persist into adulthood (Rowe et al, 2004;Eggert et al, 1996).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%