2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2013.01.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinically Insignificant Residual Fragments: An Acceptable Term in the Computed Tomography Era?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
37
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
37
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In a retrospective study of 75 patients with at least one residual fragment after PCNL, the clinical relevance of asymptomatic, noninfectious residual frag ments ≤5 mm, as detected by CT was investigated. 19 In this series, with a mean followup duration of 36 months, presence of residual fragments >3 mm was a signifi cant predictor of stone growth, with up to onethird of patients requiring secondary interventions.…”
Section: Defining Stone-freementioning
confidence: 63%
“…In a retrospective study of 75 patients with at least one residual fragment after PCNL, the clinical relevance of asymptomatic, noninfectious residual frag ments ≤5 mm, as detected by CT was investigated. 19 In this series, with a mean followup duration of 36 months, presence of residual fragments >3 mm was a signifi cant predictor of stone growth, with up to onethird of patients requiring secondary interventions.…”
Section: Defining Stone-freementioning
confidence: 63%
“…When the renal pelvic pressure exceeds 30 mmHg, pelvic reflux might be induced. In the case of intrapelvic hyperpressure, the longer the operation time, the more chance and quantity of bacteria or endotoxin can be absorbed through the pelvic reflux [20]. Small-caliber ureteral access sheath was identified as an independent risk factor for systemic inflammatory response syndrome after flexible ureteroscope lithotripsy [9].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…6,9,10 However, the proposed definition of clinically insignificant residual urinary calculi (<3 mm) together with a mean stone size of 7.09 mm minimizes the probability to overestimate the SFR in our study. 3,20,30 We present the largest series for the treatment of LPS with fURS so far with high primary SFR and low CR over a 6-year period. However, there is a lack of evidence for the treatment of LPS with only few high quality PRTs, which we cannot enhance with our retrospective data.…”
Section: Yearmentioning
confidence: 99%