1989
DOI: 10.1097/00006982-198909040-00010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinicopathologic Findings in a Patient With Serpiginous Choroiditis and Treated Choroidal Neovascularization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
43
0
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
43
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…5, May 2015 including T and B cells. 61,62 Similarly, Wu et al 63 found lymphocytic infiltrates throughout the choroid and the margin of the lesions in serpiginous choroiditis.…”
Section: Pathogenesis Of White Dot Syndromementioning
confidence: 89%
“…5, May 2015 including T and B cells. 61,62 Similarly, Wu et al 63 found lymphocytic infiltrates throughout the choroid and the margin of the lesions in serpiginous choroiditis.…”
Section: Pathogenesis Of White Dot Syndromementioning
confidence: 89%
“…Characteristic OCT findings of serpiginous choroiditis consist of hyper-reflectivity in the outer retina, an absence of changes in the inner retina, and disorganization of the RPE and chorio capillaris (Figure 12) [42]. These findings correlate well with histological studies of eyes with serpiginous choroiditis that demonstrate extensive loss of the RPE with destruction of the overlying retina and inflammation in the choriocapillaris [43]. OCT findings in eyes with VKH demonstrate multiple intraretinal hyporeflective areas representing intraretinal cysts, degeneration and breakdown of the RPE, and serous retinal detachment [44].…”
Section: Review Kimmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…11 Patients may lose central vision due to acute active lesions in the macula or to choroidal neovascularization at the margin of an inactive chorioretinal scar. 12 In our series, four of the ten eyes with serpiginous choroiditis lost central vision as a result of macular involvement of the serpiginous scar.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%