2013
DOI: 10.11622/smedj.2013041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinics in diagnostic imaging (144)

Abstract: A 35-year-old female patient with previous left knee anterior cruciate ligament repair for a skiing injury presented six years later with a traumatic lateral patellar subluxation. Radiographs and magnetic resonance imaging of her left knee joint showed an ossific structure in the region of the lateral meniscus. This was diagnosed as a meniscal ossicle and confirmed during successful arthroscopic excision. The imaging features of meniscal ossicles are reported.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Out of a total of 169 patients, 54 patients had plain radiographs. In these 54 patients (100%) [1, 3–8, 10, 14, 16, 19, 21, 24, 26–28, 30, 31, 34–36, 38, 42–45, 47, 49, 50, 54–57], an intra‐articular dens structure was detected, which led to further investigation. The imaging of this subtle structure was described as radiodense opacity, bony fragment, intra‐meniscal or intra‐articular osseous structure, ossified body, loose body, opaque body and bony mass.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Out of a total of 169 patients, 54 patients had plain radiographs. In these 54 patients (100%) [1, 3–8, 10, 14, 16, 19, 21, 24, 26–28, 30, 31, 34–36, 38, 42–45, 47, 49, 50, 54–57], an intra‐articular dens structure was detected, which led to further investigation. The imaging of this subtle structure was described as radiodense opacity, bony fragment, intra‐meniscal or intra‐articular osseous structure, ossified body, loose body, opaque body and bony mass.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then checking titles and abstracts, 55 full texts were screened and 36 of these were included for data extraction. Furthermore, two articles were retrieved from reference lists, thus a total of 38 articles [1, 3–8, 10, 11, 14, 16, 19, 21–28, 30, 31, 34–36, 38, 41–45, 47, 49, 50, 54–57] were used for our systematic analysis. All were case series or reports; no interventional or observational studies were identified.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%