2020
DOI: 10.31743/lingbaw.11829
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clitics in imperative: proclisis, enclisis and mesoclisis in Albanian and in Italo-Romance varieties of Lausberg area

Abstract: The relation between morpho-syntactic structure and its externalization into interpretive levels is the topic of this article. In many languages, typically in Romance and Albanian varieties, modal contexts, specifically imperative and infinitive, and negation, give rise to phenomena of clitic reordering and an interesting micro-variation. Imperative differs from declarative sentences in selecting enclisis except in negative contexts. Moreover, in Albanian mesoclisis appears in the 2nd plural person of imperati… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 15 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As we saw, only deictic clitics (1 st person and dative) occur in the inner position, while 3 rd person object clitics occur in the final position. Manzini and Savoia (2011b), Baldi and Savoia (2020) attribute this to the fact that the deictic interpretation does not need to be anchored to the eventive position v, unlike 3 rd person elements. More simply, the 3 rd person clitic is inserted in its canonical position at the end of the string, in the scope of the deictic elements, so that the two interpretive domains, deictic vs event-anchored elements, are split.…”
Section: Mesoclisis In Imperativesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As we saw, only deictic clitics (1 st person and dative) occur in the inner position, while 3 rd person object clitics occur in the final position. Manzini and Savoia (2011b), Baldi and Savoia (2020) attribute this to the fact that the deictic interpretation does not need to be anchored to the eventive position v, unlike 3 rd person elements. More simply, the 3 rd person clitic is inserted in its canonical position at the end of the string, in the scope of the deictic elements, so that the two interpretive domains, deictic vs event-anchored elements, are split.…”
Section: Mesoclisis In Imperativesmentioning
confidence: 99%