2010
DOI: 10.3724/sp.j.1001.2010.03551
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clone Selection Algorithm to Solve Preference Multi-Objective Optimization

Abstract: The difficulty of current multi-objective optimization community lies in the large number of objectives.Lacking enough selection pressure toward the Pareto front, classical algorithms are greatly restrained. In this paper, preference rank immune memory clone selection algorithm (PISA) is proposed to solve the problem of multi-objective optimization with a large number of objectives. The nondominated antibodies are proportionally cloned by their preference ranks, which are defined by their preference informatio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In our experiment, k = 10 is used in DTLZ2, whereas k = 7 is used in DTLZ3. For various algorithm performance evaluation and comparison, we choose generation distance (GD) and spacing (S) as standard [1].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In our experiment, k = 10 is used in DTLZ2, whereas k = 7 is used in DTLZ3. For various algorithm performance evaluation and comparison, we choose generation distance (GD) and spacing (S) as standard [1].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because the convergence and distribution of PISA algorithm are better than LbsNSGA-II and NSGA-II [1], we only compare the DMABC algorithm with PISA algorithm. For five objects on DTLZ2 problem, the coverage of PISA algorithm on the first four objects are 0.3 ~ 0.5, on the fifth object is 0.2 ~ 0.5; On the other hand, the coverage of the DMABC algorithm on the all five objects can reach the theoretical value 0 ~ 1.…”
Section: Figure1 Results Of Dmabc On Dtlz2 With Five Objectives and mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In phase 2, an elitist group was employed to maintain the current Pareto optimal solution's distribution properties; typical algorithms include the Pareto archived evolutionary strategy (PAES) A by Knowles et al, the strength Pareto evolutionary algorithm (SPEA) A and SPEA2 by Zitzler and Thiele et al [21], and the improved NSGA A (NSGA-II), which is based on an elitist strategy, by Deb and Pratap et al [22]. In phase 3, hybrid algorithms were developed from combinations of the multi-objective evolutionary algorithm and other emerging intelligent algorithms, such as the immune multi-objective optimization algorithm (IMOA) A [23] and multiobjective particle swarm optimization (MOPSO) A [24].…”
Section: Multi-objective Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%