2015 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) 2015
DOI: 10.1109/iros.2015.7354075
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Closed form characterization of collision free velocities and confidence bounds for non-holonomic robots in uncertain dynamic environments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Secondly, the fixed final time paradigm of optimization (16) is not equipped to capture the effect of increase in traversal time of reaching motions due to presence of obstacles. A possible solution to this could be developed using the time scaling concepts [14]. Our current study is limited to developing and approximating an efficient solution for the computational framework, and demonstrating the homotopies and strategies that can be explained within this framework, and we do not test our predictions against real reaching data.…”
Section: Discussion and Future Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Secondly, the fixed final time paradigm of optimization (16) is not equipped to capture the effect of increase in traversal time of reaching motions due to presence of obstacles. A possible solution to this could be developed using the time scaling concepts [14]. Our current study is limited to developing and approximating an efficient solution for the computational framework, and demonstrating the homotopies and strategies that can be explained within this framework, and we do not test our predictions against real reaching data.…”
Section: Discussion and Future Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, we next reformulate these chance constraints into a tractable form and show that the reformulation naturally leads to an efficient optimization structure. Reformulating Chance Constraints: We follow [14], and substitute of P r(C t i (.)) with:…”
Section: B Optimal Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…becomes a very challenging problem. A workaround has been proposed in works like [14], [16], [17] where the analytical expressions for E [. ] and Var [.…”
Section: A Computational Challengementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is worth pointing out that there are various heuristics for choosing the point s * . One of them which has been shown to result in low approximation errors is to choose s * from the solution space of µ s f RV O i j ≥ 0 [14]. It is easy to note that solving it is similar to solving (17).…”
Section: Time Scaled Variant Of Surrogate Constraintsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also provide a computationally efficient approach for solving these complex set of inequalities. To this end, we build upon our recent series of works [14], [15], where chance constraints are substituted with a more tractable family of surrogate constraints. The solution space of each member of the family can be mapped in closed form to the probability with each the original chance constraints are satisfied.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%