2022
DOI: 10.1049/ell2.12487
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Closed‐form expressions for spatial correlation parameters for performance analysis of fluid antenna systems

Abstract: The emerging fluid antenna technology enables a high‐density position‐switchable antenna in a small space to obtain enormous performance gains for wireless communications. To understand the theoretical performance of fluid antenna systems, it is important to account for the strong spatial correlation over the different positions (referred to as ‘ports'). Previous works used a classical, generalised correlation model to characterise the channel correlation among the ports but were limited by the lack of degree … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
63
0
4

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
63
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, in[142], it was proposed to set all the {µ k } to be equal so that the correlation between any two ports can be better modeled.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, in[142], it was proposed to set all the {µ k } to be equal so that the correlation between any two ports can be better modeled.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is well-known that the diversity defines the slope of the outage probability's curve and the outage gain represents the "distance" to the vertical axis [22], i.e., the smaller the value G o , the better. From (19), we can observe that correlation negatively affects the outage gain. It follows that the achieved diversity is independent of the FA's topology but the employed topological space characterizes the achieved outage gain.…”
Section: A Estimated (Pre-scheduling) Channelsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Note that alternative spatial correlation models were recently proposed in[19],[20] which differ slightly from the one used in this paper. It would be an interesting future work to extend the work of this paper using the new models.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [6, 9], the channel, gk(u,u)$g^{(\tilde{u},u)}_k$, is modelled based on the generalized correlation model in [10] via the correlation parameter μ, that is gk=Ω1μ2xk+μx0+jΩ1μ2yk+μy0,fork=1,2,,N,$$\begin{align} {g}_{k}=\mathrm{\Omega}\left(\sqrt{1-{\mu}^{2}}{x}_{k}+\mu {x}_{0}\right)+j\mathrm{\Omega}\left(\sqrt{1-{\mu}^{2}}{y}_{k}+\mu {y}_{0}\right),\nonumber\\[-4pt] \text{for}\;k=1,2,\ldots ,N, \end{align}$$where x0,x1,,xN,y0,y1,,yN$x_0,x_1,\dots ,x_N,y_0,y_1,\dots ,y_N$ are all independent and identically distributed (i.i.d.) Gaussian random variables with zero mean and variance of 0.5, and the parameter, μ, can be obtained using [9, Theorem 1]. Note that in (), the superscript false(trueu,ufalse)$(\tilde{u},u)$ is omitted for conciseness.…”
Section: Channel Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Channel model: In [6,9], the channel, g ( ũ,u) k , is modelled based on the generalized correlation model in [10] via the correlation parameter μ, that is…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%