1998
DOI: 10.1137/s0040585x97976301
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Closedness of Sum Spaces andthe Generalized Schrödinger Problem

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is thus of primary interest to find proxies for OT distances, that can provably approximate faithfully the true distance and transport plan, while offering a better computational complexity than traditional linear programming solvers such as simplex methods [18] or interior points methods [39]. This article explores the use of an entropic smoothing of the initial linear program, that was proposed initially by Schrödinger [44] (see [43,36]), and that has recently been revitalized in fields as diverse as machine learning [24], computer graphics [48] and social sciences [30].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is thus of primary interest to find proxies for OT distances, that can provably approximate faithfully the true distance and transport plan, while offering a better computational complexity than traditional linear programming solvers such as simplex methods [18] or interior points methods [39]. This article explores the use of an entropic smoothing of the initial linear program, that was proposed initially by Schrödinger [44] (see [43,36]), and that has recently been revitalized in fields as diverse as machine learning [24], computer graphics [48] and social sciences [30].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This theorem appears in [8] under a slightly different form. The proof is interesting as it provides an algorithm of determination of u and v. It is an important generalization of the Iterated Projection Fitting Procedure (see [5], [12], and [13]), which has been rediscovered and utilized many times under different names for various applied purposes: "RAS algorithm" [10], "biproportional fitting", "Sinkhorn Scaling" [4], etc. However, all these techniques and their variants can be recast as particular cases of the method described in the proof of Theorem 1.…”
Section: The Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where u i and v j are the regularized Kantorovich potential. Then, a i and b j can be uniquely determined by the marginal constraint [78]) proved, in the continous measure framework, that a unique KL-projection exists and takes the form γ(x, y) = a(x) ⊗ b(y)γ(x, y) (where a(x) and b(y) are non-negative functions).…”
Section: Numericsmentioning
confidence: 99%