“Closer” or Context? Explaining Donald Trump’s Relations with Congress

Abstract

Donald Trump entered office with aspirations for transformational policy change, much of which would have to be approved by Congress. Despite the president's many unique characteristics, we can employ the framework of the president's strategic position to explain his lack of success. The president's opportunity structure was mixed. He lacked an electoral mandate but was fortunate enough to serve in a unified government. Nevertheless, Republican cohesion was imperfect, partisan polarization was high, and there was little public pressure for Democrats to abate their strong opposition. The structure of most of the choices before Congress did not favor the president. As a result, he has not been successful in obtaining congressional support for most of his major initiatives. Making strategic assessments by asking a few key questions about the president's political environment provides us with crucial leverage for evaluating a president's likely success in obtaining the support of Congress for his initiatives.

Populism and the American Party System: Opportunities and Constraints

“…The Trump presidency fits the usual pattern. Trump faced significant congressional resistance to his legislative agenda even in unified government during his first two years in office (Edwards 2018), and congressional resistance further hardened after the 2018 midterms. The upshot is President Trump's control over national government was weaker in 2019 than it had been in 2017, consistent with the normal decay in presidential authority over time.…”

Foreign direct investment screening and congressional backlash politics in the United States

“…Scholarship indicates congressional Republicans have not jumped to join Trump’s anti-globalist agenda (e.g. see Edwards, 2018). Yet over time, this reticence may fade, and future research might fruitfully examine the potential evolution of partisan differences on FDI and other globalisation policies.…”