This paper explores the bene ts and costs of the voter initiative, a direct democracy device that allows voters to make policy decisions without involving their elected representatives. Previous research suggests that by i n troducing competition" into the proposal process, the initiative leads to policies that are closer to the voter's ideal point. In our model, in contrast, the e ect of the initiative is conditional on the severity of representative agency problems and the uncertainty about voter preferences. The initiative always makes the voter better o when representatives are faithful agents, but when voter preferences are uncertain, initiatives can cause shirking" representatives to choose policies farther from the voter's ideal point. Our evidence shows that initiatives reduce state spending when Democrats control the government, when the tax base is vulnerable to common pool" problems, and when citizens have diverse preferences.Comments welcome. We received very helpful suggestions from
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.