2008
DOI: 10.3390/ijms9030272
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Closing in on Chemical Bonds by Opening up Relativity Theory

Abstract: This paper develops a connection between the phenomenology of chemical bonding and the theory of relativity. Empirical correlations between electron numbers in atoms and chemical bond stabilities in molecules are first reviewed and extended. Quantitative chemical bond strengths are then related to ionization potentials in elements. Striking patterns in ionization potentials are revealed when the data are viewed in an element-independent way, where element-specific details are removed via an appropriate scaling… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Across this eminent research in the directions of electronegativity and chemical hardness, there have been distinguished as providing a special way of treating complex phenomena: by variational principles, so employing them in the most general way, they also provided a fruitful analytical tools for the quantification of atoms-in-bonding and atoms-in-molecules in a way that is not reductive to physics [ 120 , 121 ]. In this line, the present work succeeded in combining electronegativity and chemical hardness into the so-called chemical power, viewed as their ratio, and further inspiring the construction of the chemical orthogonal space (COS) with the consequence in generalizing the previous Parr–Pearson modelling of chemical bonding; apart of “rediscovering” the maximum charge transfer in chemical reactivity and PP approach as a limiting B→A (2D→1D) geometrical framework [ 6 , 11 ], the present COS also solves the long-term controversy about the non-zero values for charge transfer and exchanged energies in homonuclear bondings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Across this eminent research in the directions of electronegativity and chemical hardness, there have been distinguished as providing a special way of treating complex phenomena: by variational principles, so employing them in the most general way, they also provided a fruitful analytical tools for the quantification of atoms-in-bonding and atoms-in-molecules in a way that is not reductive to physics [ 120 , 121 ]. In this line, the present work succeeded in combining electronegativity and chemical hardness into the so-called chemical power, viewed as their ratio, and further inspiring the construction of the chemical orthogonal space (COS) with the consequence in generalizing the previous Parr–Pearson modelling of chemical bonding; apart of “rediscovering” the maximum charge transfer in chemical reactivity and PP approach as a limiting B→A (2D→1D) geometrical framework [ 6 , 11 ], the present COS also solves the long-term controversy about the non-zero values for charge transfer and exchanged energies in homonuclear bondings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Ref. [1] gave a detailed development of the IP ’s for IO > 1 and presented the information without using the decomposition of IP 1 ,Z into IP 1,1 and IP 1 ,Z . )…”
Section: Algebraic Chemistrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ionization potentials are generally measurable, and data about them is fairly abundant. As shown in [ 1 ], ionization potentials fall into reliable patterns that can be characterized algebraically. Ionization potentials constitute the basic information needed to support the calculations in the following Sections.…”
Section: Algebraic Chemistrymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On the other side, although many of the relativistic effects were explored by considering them in the self-consistent equation of atomic and molecular structure computation [ 58 62 ], the recent reloaded thesis of Einstein’s special relativity [ 63 , 64 ] into the algebraic formulation of chemistry [ 65 – 67 ], widely asks for a further reformation of the chemical bonding quantum-relativistic vision [ 68 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%