BackgroundPatients with breast cancer living in rural areas are less likely to undergo breast reconstruction. Further, given the additional training and resources required for autologous reconstruction, it is likely that rural patients face barriers to accessing these surgical options. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to determine if there are disparities in autologous breast reconstruction care among rural patients on the national level.MethodsThe Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project Nationwide Inpatient Sample Database was queried from 2012 to 2019 using ICD9/10 codes for breast cancer diagnoses and autologous breast reconstruction. The resulting data set was analyzed for patient, hospital, and complication‐specific information with counties comprised of less than 10,000 inhabitants classified as rural.ResultsFrom 2012 to 2019, 89,700 weighted encounters for autologous breast reconstruction involved patients who lived in non‐rural areas, while 3605 involved patients from rural counties. The majority of rural patients underwent reconstruction at urban teaching hospitals. However, rural patients were more likely than non‐rural patients to have their surgery at a rural hospital (6.8% vs. 0.7%). Rural‐county residing patients had lower odds of receiving a deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap compared to non‐rural‐county residing patients (OR 0.51 CI: 0.48–0.55, p < .0001). Further, rural patients were more likely to experience infection and wound disruption than urban patients (p < .05), regardless of where they underwent surgery. Complication rates were similar among rural patients who received care at rural hospitals versus urban hospitals (p > .05). Meanwhile, the cost of autologous breast reconstruction was higher (p = .011) for rural patients at an urban hospital ($30,066.2, SD19,965.5) than at a rural hospital ($25,049.5, SD12,397.2).ConclusionPatients living in rural areas face disparities in health care, including lower odds of being potentially offered gold‐standard breast reconstruction treatments. Increased microsurgical option availability and patient education in rural areas may help alleviate current disparities in breast reconstruction.