2014
DOI: 10.1117/12.2069068
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cloud vertical structures detected by lidar and its statistical results at HeRO site in Hefei, China

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Figure 5a, it is obvious that non-precipitation cloud dominates the cloud fraction. The cloudless occurrence frequencies of ground-based lidars over Hefei site (which is very close to the result in a previous study [21]) and Jinhua site are higher than that of 2B-CLDCLASS-LIDAR over the defined region. However, the grid box containing Hefei site has a better agreement with the ground-based lidar measurement than the equivalent comparison for Jinhua.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In Figure 5a, it is obvious that non-precipitation cloud dominates the cloud fraction. The cloudless occurrence frequencies of ground-based lidars over Hefei site (which is very close to the result in a previous study [21]) and Jinhua site are higher than that of 2B-CLDCLASS-LIDAR over the defined region. However, the grid box containing Hefei site has a better agreement with the ground-based lidar measurement than the equivalent comparison for Jinhua.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The extensive distribution of cloud macro-physical properties has an important effect on the cloud radiative effect associated with the atmospheric radiation transfer process, and on the cloud In the defined region, two lidar observation sites (see Figure 1) had been set up to measure the vertical structure of macro-and micro-physical properties of aerosols and clouds. The National Institute for Environmental Studies (NIES) lidar in the Hefei site had thirty months of observation data from January 2012 to October 2014 [20,21]. This lidar had three channels at wavelengths of 532 nm and 1064 nm and depolarization at 532 nm.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%