Cluster analysis of an Ising–Preisach interacting particle system

Rotărescu, C.; Petrila, Iulian; Stancu, Alexandru

doi:10.1016/j.physb.2011.03.026

Cited by 3 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 26 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In Ref. 20 these two models. In this case, we have implemented a zero Kelvin Ising-Preisach model (0K-IPM) for nanowire arrays.…”

Section: Ising-type Model For the Forc Diagramsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…To give a physical interpretation of the nanowire arrays FORC diagrams, we propose a very simple model that accounts for state dependent interactions between wires. 15,20 We consider a rectangular nanowire array of 40 Â 40 ðN ¼ 1600Þ cylindrical wires with the same length (L ¼ 6 lm) and radius (R ¼ 40 nm) perfectly ordered in a 2-D square grid with the constant a (interwire distance). Following Ref.…”

Section: Ising-type Model For the Forc Diagramsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In Sec. III, a physical Ising-type model 20 for the wire networks is presented. Sections IV and V are dedicated to the discussion of the FORC results in two different approaches used in Preisach theory: (i) interactions are a)…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

What does a first-order reversal curve diagram really mean? A study case: Array of ferromagnetic nanowires

Dobrotă

Stancu

2013

Journal of Applied Physics

Self Cite

154

139

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The magnetic characterization technique of hysteretic materials based on the measurement of the first-order reversal curves (FORC) is one of the most appealing methods recently introduced in hundreds of new laboratories, but due to the complexity of the FORC data analysis, it is not always properly used. This method originated in identification procedures for the classical Preisach model and consequently often the FORC distribution is interpreted as a slightly distorted Preisach distribution. In this paper, we discuss this idea from two points of view derived from the basic assumptions used in the Preisach model. One is that the interaction field is equivalent with a shift of the rectangular hysteron along the applied field axis without changing the intrinsic coercivity. The other is the direct use of switching fields as coordinates, in fact, the ones defining the Preisach plane. We discuss the compatibility between the experimental FORC distribution and the Preisach model developed on the interaction field hypothesis. As a "toy model," we are using a system of ferromagnetic nanowires, explaining from the physical point of view the complex FORC diagrams as they are obtained in experiments. This explanation gives a fundament for the correct interpretation of the FORC diagram in order to get "Preisach type" information about the system, mainly about the distributions of coercive and interaction fields within the sample. These results are relevant for many ferromagnetic systems and give a valuable guide for understanding the FORC technique and its fundamental link with the Preisach model. V

show abstract

“…In Ref. 20 these two models. In this case, we have implemented a zero Kelvin Ising-Preisach model (0K-IPM) for nanowire arrays.…”

Section: Ising-type Model For the Forc Diagramsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Ising-type Model For the Forc Diagramsmentioning

confidence: 99%