2020 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV) 2020
DOI: 10.1109/iv47402.2020.9304646
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clustering of the Scenario Space for the Assessment of Automated Driving

Abstract: Assessment and testing are among the biggest challenges for the release of automated driving. Up to this date, the exact procedure to achieve homologation is not settled. Current research focuses on scenario-based approaches that represent driving scenarios as test cases within a scenario space. This avoids redundancies in testing, enables the inclusion of virtual testing into the process, and makes a statement about test coverage possible. However, it is unclear how to define such a scenario space and the cov… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is in accordance with literature, in which HAC is described as suitable for use cases with many clusters and many samples [21]. Furthermore, this is in line with other publications in the context of real-data based scenario extraction, both based on similarly structured data sources [33] as well as for other types of data sources [34].…”
Section: Clusteringsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This is in accordance with literature, in which HAC is described as suitable for use cases with many clusters and many samples [21]. Furthermore, this is in line with other publications in the context of real-data based scenario extraction, both based on similarly structured data sources [33] as well as for other types of data sources [34].…”
Section: Clusteringsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…In literature, three different testing criteria categories, namely external, internal and relative indices, are defined to be able to estimate the quality of clustering results [20]. In accordance with present work in the field of unsupervised scenario extraction (e.g., [33], [34], and [38]), one branch of our evaluation approach can be assigned to the external indices category, where external information is used as standard to validate the clustering results. For this purpose, we use the map information available within the datasets in the form of images of the corresponding traffic spaces.…”
Section: E Cluster Validation and Results Interpretationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…More similar to this work are [3] (LSTM+CNN), [4] (SeqDSPN), [5] (RC-GAN), where the latent representations of deep neural networks are used to cluster scenarios. Also a lot of non-machine learning approaches were used to determine representations or similarities of scenarios, such as in [3] (DTW), [6] (DTW+PCA), [12] (Dynamic-Length-Segmentation), [13] (custom similarity measure). In this work, an expert-knowledge aided latent representation is introduced, and hence differs from the aforementioned works.…”
Section: Related Work a Traffic Scenario Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the works [10], [11] only little static information are used. Whereas in the works [3], [4], [5], [6] and [13] only spatial and dynamic information is used. This work focuses on the static environment of a traffic scenario.…”
Section: Related Work a Traffic Scenario Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%