2015
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stv1541
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CMB quenching of high-redshift radio-loud AGNs

Abstract: The very existence of more than a dozen of high-redshift (z ∼ > 4) blazars indicates that a much larger population of misaligned powerful jetted AGN was already in place when the Universe was ∼ < 1.5 Gyr old. Such parent population proved to be very elusive, and escaped direct detection in radio surveys so far. High redshift blazars themselves seem to be failing in producing extended radio-lobes, raising questions about the connection between such class and the vaster population of radio-galaxies. We show that… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
47
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
2
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In all of our models, the global signal is heavily impacted only when the ratio between radio and bolometric luminosity is similar to low redshift. As recognized in previous works (Ghisellini et al 2014(Ghisellini et al , 2015Saxena et al 2017), this cannot be the case for classical FRII lobes where magnetic fields tend to be below 100µG. More recently, S18 showed that regions where magnetic fields are below 1000µG would not produce appreciable SE due to IC scattering.…”
Section: Is Inverse Compton Cooling a Showstopper?mentioning
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In all of our models, the global signal is heavily impacted only when the ratio between radio and bolometric luminosity is similar to low redshift. As recognized in previous works (Ghisellini et al 2014(Ghisellini et al , 2015Saxena et al 2017), this cannot be the case for classical FRII lobes where magnetic fields tend to be below 100µG. More recently, S18 showed that regions where magnetic fields are below 1000µG would not produce appreciable SE due to IC scattering.…”
Section: Is Inverse Compton Cooling a Showstopper?mentioning
confidence: 80%
“…It has long been recognized that the diffuse lobes, that dominate radio emission in many low-redshift active galactic nuclei (AGN), should be suppressed at high redshift. The higher energy density of the Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) is expected to cause relativistic electrons to shed their energy through inverse Compton (IC) scattering instead of synchrotron emission (SE) (e.g., Ghisellini et al 2014Ghisellini et al , 2015Saxena et al 2017). IC suppression of SE may partially explain the dearth of SDSS quasars matched with radio sources at z 3 (Haiman et al 2004;McGreer et al 2009;Volonteri et al 2011).…”
Section: ; Mcquinn 2016))mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This value is within the range of what one would expect for synchrotron emitted by shock injected electrons, such as what is observed in the lobes and hot-spots of low-redshift radio sources. However, diffuse lobe emission may be difficult to produce at high redshifts due to enhanced Compton cooling from CMB photons (Ghisellini et al 2014(Ghisellini et al , 2015Saxena et al 2017). Sharma (2018) notes that the short cooling times at high redshift would lead to spectral aging and an index closer to ≈ −1.1.…”
Section: Radio Emissionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The jet deposits its power into the hotspots through a termination shock, which in turn energizes the more extended lobes. To model the radiation produced in the hotspots we follow the prescriptions detailed in Ghisellini et al (2015). The particle injection function obeys Eq.…”
Section: Hotspot Emissionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We establish robust, conservative criteria to isolate a subset of objects with statistically significant, extended X-ray emission ( §2). For those, we decompose the X-ray emission into core and extended (lobes+hotspots) components, and model the resulting broadband SEDs following Ghisellini et al (2015), accounting for both CMB as well as IR emission from the host galaxy as possible Comptonization seed photons ( §3). We summarize and discuss our results in §4.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%