2022
DOI: 10.14569/ijacsa.2022.0130497
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CNN-LSTM Based Approach for Dos Attacks Detection in Wireless Sensor Networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It has mainly concentrated on DoS (Denial of Service) a acks. The classification outcome demonstrates that the existing system a ained an accuracy of 0.944 [27]. In the same way, wormhole and blackhole a ack detection in the wireless sensor networks system has been generated in existing research.…”
Section: Review Of Literaturementioning
confidence: 59%
“…It has mainly concentrated on DoS (Denial of Service) a acks. The classification outcome demonstrates that the existing system a ained an accuracy of 0.944 [27]. In the same way, wormhole and blackhole a ack detection in the wireless sensor networks system has been generated in existing research.…”
Section: Review Of Literaturementioning
confidence: 59%
“…Salmi and Oughdir [20] presented a CNN-LSTM approach to detect and classify DoS intrusion attacks as Flooding,Blackhole, Normal, TDMA, or Grayhole.This research study uses a computer-generated wireless sensor network-detection system WSN-DS dataset;The developed model gives a promising outcome in the attack detection process and successfully classifies the given attacks with a accuracy of 97%.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Collect network data and preprocess it to generate 23 functions, classify the condition of each sensor, and simulate five types of DoS using the NS-2 network simulator LEACH-based routing protocol to replicate the wireless sensor network environment. The proposed CNN-LSTM model was tested in 25 epochs, and the accuracy, precision, and sensitivity scores were 0.944, 0.959, and 0.922, respectively, everything within the 0-1 range [18].…”
Section: Literature Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%