2007
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.76.195440
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CO adsorption on metal surfaces: A hybrid functional study with plane-wave basis set

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

24
152
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 143 publications
(178 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
24
152
2
Order By: Relevance
“…35,36 For example, in HSE06, 33, 37 ω = 0.11a −1 0 (a 0 is the Bohr radius) and in Perdew-Burke-Ernzerhof (PBEh) global hybrid, 38 it is 25 % short-range exact exchange and 75 % short-range PBE exchange. Even though the HSE functional, in most cases, accurately reproduces the optical gap in semiconductors, it severely underestimates the gap in insulators 36,39 and its band width in metallic systems is generally too large. 36,[39][40][41] The Engel and Vosko 42 (EV) GGA and the Tran and Blaha 43 modified Becke-Johnson (TB-mBJ) have also provided some improvements to the band gap of materials.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…35,36 For example, in HSE06, 33, 37 ω = 0.11a −1 0 (a 0 is the Bohr radius) and in Perdew-Burke-Ernzerhof (PBEh) global hybrid, 38 it is 25 % short-range exact exchange and 75 % short-range PBE exchange. Even though the HSE functional, in most cases, accurately reproduces the optical gap in semiconductors, it severely underestimates the gap in insulators 36,39 and its band width in metallic systems is generally too large. 36,[39][40][41] The Engel and Vosko 42 (EV) GGA and the Tran and Blaha 43 modified Becke-Johnson (TB-mBJ) have also provided some improvements to the band gap of materials.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sX(1.44) gives the largest difference of adsorption energies between the atop and fcc adsorption, which is difficult to achieve by other functionals including some approaches by the HSE06. 35 This is closely related to the larger HOMO-LUMO gap of CO from the sX(1.44) that prevents the predominant contribution of back-donation in the bond formation, which is inherently strong for the fcc adsorption 46,52 and becomes more effectively if the CO HOMO-LUMO gap is small.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was noted that increasing the energy difference between the highest occupied molecular orbital (HOMO) and the lowest unoccupied molecular orbital (LUMO) might cure this problem of DFT, [32][33][34] and that this could be achieved by using hybrid functionals. 33,[35][36][37][38] However, the B3LYP functional marginally failed to achieve this site preference, 33 as did a study using the HSE06 hybrid functional. 35 A recent work found that the PBEh hybrid functional can give the correct site preference by treating the 5s and 5p states as the core states.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To this end, DFT can be utilized to explicitly describe electronic structures of the system particles in greater details, which can help in extending the conceptual model of CO chemisorption [90][91][92][93][94]. Unfortunately, due to the inherent wrong description of the electronic structure by DFT, wrong predictions of CO preferred adsorption sites are observed that contradict experimental results, especially for the (111) surface facets of transition metals, leading to the so-called "CO adsorption Puzzle" [95,96]. The root of this DFT problem resides on the fact that both local density and generalized gradient approximation functionals underestimate the CO bandgap, predicting wrong positions of the CO frontier orbitals, which results in an overestimated bond strength between the substrate and surface molecules [97].…”
Section: Solving the Co Adsorption Puzzle With The U Correctionmentioning
confidence: 99%