2013
DOI: 10.4155/fmc.12.196
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CO and CO-Releasing Molecules in Medicinal Chemistry

Abstract: Since the discovery that CO acts as a cytoprotective and homeostatic molecule, increasing research efforts have been devoted to the exploitation of its therapeutic effects. Both endogenous and exogenous CO improves experimental lung, vascular and cardiac injuries and protects against several inflammatory states. The technology is now in place to bring CO to clinical applications, but the use of the gaseous molecule poses several problems. The challenges associated with the clinical implementation of the gas ha… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
89
0
4

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 104 publications
(93 citation statements)
references
References 88 publications
0
89
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Unlike most common drugs whose pharmacological action is dependent on their interaction with a macromolecular target and whose potency is dictated by the stability of the drug-target complex, CORMs exert their therapeutic action via the liberated CO molecules. [1][2][3][4][5] However, apart from the common scientific consensus that CORM-based therapy should not lead to significant carboxyhemoglobin (COHb) formation and to the inhibition of respiratory enzymes that are sensitive to CO, it is questionable whether CORMs should release CO slowly or rapidly and what kinetics of CO release is most advantageous for therapeutic applications. There are only few reports clearly showing the advantages of CORMs slowly releasing CO over those releasing CO instantly 6,7 and they relate to the anti-platelet effects of CORMs.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike most common drugs whose pharmacological action is dependent on their interaction with a macromolecular target and whose potency is dictated by the stability of the drug-target complex, CORMs exert their therapeutic action via the liberated CO molecules. [1][2][3][4][5] However, apart from the common scientific consensus that CORM-based therapy should not lead to significant carboxyhemoglobin (COHb) formation and to the inhibition of respiratory enzymes that are sensitive to CO, it is questionable whether CORMs should release CO slowly or rapidly and what kinetics of CO release is most advantageous for therapeutic applications. There are only few reports clearly showing the advantages of CORMs slowly releasing CO over those releasing CO instantly 6,7 and they relate to the anti-platelet effects of CORMs.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The facial tricarbonyl fac-[RuCl(glycinate)(CO)3], often referred to as CORM-3, is the prototypical water-soluble CORM in this area (Chatterjee, 2004;Johnson et al, 2007). Details of CO donors (RomĂŁo et al 2012;, Zobi, 2013;Gonzales and Mascharak, 2014) and an excellent methodological review on measurement techniques of CO (Motterlini and Otterbein, 2010) are available. Such molecules confer cardioprotection both in ex vivo and in vivo experiments.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There has therefore been significant effort to produce molecules which can release CO, so-called CORMs (carbon monoxide releasing molecules). [16][17][18][19][20] The majority of these systems are based around metal carbonyl fragments, which offer a direct route to the release of CO. Such organometallic therapeutics are unusual, and efforts have been made to exploit alternative CO sources.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%