2017
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-56829-4_18
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Co-author Recommender System

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We have improved recommender systems (Makarov, Bulanov & Zhukov, 2017;Makarov et al, 2018a) based on choosing proper link embedding operator (Makarov et al, 2018b) and including research interest information presented as embedding of nodes in keywords co-occurrence network connecting keywords relating to a given research article. We have compared several machine learning models for future and missing LP problems interpreted as a binary classification problem.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We have improved recommender systems (Makarov, Bulanov & Zhukov, 2017;Makarov et al, 2018a) based on choosing proper link embedding operator (Makarov et al, 2018b) and including research interest information presented as embedding of nodes in keywords co-occurrence network connecting keywords relating to a given research article. We have compared several machine learning models for future and missing LP problems interpreted as a binary classification problem.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We study the problem of finding collaborator depending on his/her research community, the quality of publications and structural patterns based on co-authorship network suggested by Newman (2004aNewman ( , 2004b. Early unsupervised learning approaches Makarov, Bulanov & Zhukov (2017) and Makarov et al (2018a). In what follows, we describe solution to the LP problem leading to evaluation of our recommender system based on co-authorship network embeddings and manually engineered features for HSE researchers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have improved recommender systems [35,34], based on choosing proper link embedding operator [38] and including research interest information presented as embedding of nodes in keywords co-occurrence network connecting keywords relating to a given research article. We have compared several machine learning models for future and missing link prediction problems interpreted as binary classification problem.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We compare our approach with state-of-the-art algorithms for link prediction problem using structural, attribute and combined feature space to evaluate the impact of the suggested approach on the binary classification task of predicting links in co-authorship network. Such obtained system could be applied for expert search, recommending collaborator or scientific adviser, and searching for relevant research publications similar to the work proposed in [35,34]. In what follows, we describe solution to link prediction problem leading to evaluation of our recommender system based on co-authorship network embeddings and manually engineered features for HSE researchers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further methods for identifying existing collaborations between various researchers from various publication databases are presented below [17] developed a co-authorship network to reveal the interactions between researchers. A system for selecting a collaborator with similar research interests for joint research was modeled as a link prediction problem.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%