Teaching and Learning Second Language Pragmatics for Intercultural Understanding 2021
DOI: 10.4324/9781003094128-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Co-constructing Nonessentialist Pedagogy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1
1
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The findings suggest that even though the concept of pragmatics is still vague to some extent for some language instructors, non-native English teachers are aware of the concept. While a lower percentage of language instructors who were unaware of the concept of pragmatics is to be expected as the research sample is diverse, consisting of instructors holding different academic degrees and having different teaching experiences and training, the importance of some basic knowledge of pragmatics for instructors goes without saying (Ishihara, 2011;Kasper, 1997;Yates and Wigglesworth, 2005). Generally, this supports the findings of earlier studies carried out in different contexts, such as Ekin and Damar (2013), who found that EFL trainee teachers generally had an awareness of the theoretical knowledge of pragmatics.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The findings suggest that even though the concept of pragmatics is still vague to some extent for some language instructors, non-native English teachers are aware of the concept. While a lower percentage of language instructors who were unaware of the concept of pragmatics is to be expected as the research sample is diverse, consisting of instructors holding different academic degrees and having different teaching experiences and training, the importance of some basic knowledge of pragmatics for instructors goes without saying (Ishihara, 2011;Kasper, 1997;Yates and Wigglesworth, 2005). Generally, this supports the findings of earlier studies carried out in different contexts, such as Ekin and Damar (2013), who found that EFL trainee teachers generally had an awareness of the theoretical knowledge of pragmatics.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To achieve adequate instruction of pragmatics and communicative competence for the EFL learners, teachers need to have some SJLS 2,2 knowledge bases. Knowledge of pragmatics is viewed as a requisite element of the knowledge base for language teachers (Ishihara, 2011). Some qualifications for effective teachers of second language pragmatics have been stated to include their knowledge of pragmatics in terms of pragmatic awareness of norms and variation, their knowledge of pedagogical content in terms of their ability to deliver pragmatically attentive teaching and assessment and their knowledge of their leaners and the context in terms of being sensitive to their learners' culture and subjectivity (Ishihara, 2011;Kasper, 1997;Yates and Wigglesworth, 2005).…”
Section: Teachers' Role In Pragmatic Competencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…IIP supports learner agency in three ways. First, IIP helps learners avoid judging the behaviours of culturally different others based on their own cultural values (Ishihara & Porcellato, 2021). Second, learners are encouraged to notice the influence of their cultural assumptions on their pragmatic practices, interpretation of cultural others, and language learning experience (Liddicoat, 2017).…”
Section: Iip Feature 1: Learner Agencymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Third, IIP raises awareness of L2 pragmatic norms, rather than imposing them. This means refraining from penalising learners' decision to diverge from L2 pragmatic norms (Ishihara & Porcellato, 2021).…”
Section: Iip Feature 1: Learner Agencymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation