2021
DOI: 10.1002/icd.2273
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Co‐creating developmental science

Abstract: Co‐creating science with members of the researched population improves the science being conducted. Here, we argue that developmental science would particularly benefit from incorporating co‐creation into the scientific process given the unique strength of including the perspectives of young people with lived experiences in scientific research. We propose that developmental scientists approach co‐created research similarly to other open science practices and provide considerations for working with young people… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By adding a single questionnaire item to an existing statewide health and behavioral risk survey, we were able to systematically identify caregiving students in schools and assess their outcomes for the second time in U.S. history. Indeed, partnerships between researchers and educators and school administrators provide unique opportunities for co-creating science (Whitmore & Mills, 2021) and facilitating research that directly addresses the needs of students and schools. Our findings demonstrate the need for more partnerships specifically focused on caregiving students across the United States.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By adding a single questionnaire item to an existing statewide health and behavioral risk survey, we were able to systematically identify caregiving students in schools and assess their outcomes for the second time in U.S. history. Indeed, partnerships between researchers and educators and school administrators provide unique opportunities for co-creating science (Whitmore & Mills, 2021) and facilitating research that directly addresses the needs of students and schools. Our findings demonstrate the need for more partnerships specifically focused on caregiving students across the United States.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The academic community tends to collaborate with similar actors due to different institutional conditions (van Rijnsoever and Hessels, 2021). Co-creative initiatives require significant resources and continuous investments in project management, processes, and staff to overcome organizational and knowledge differences (Pinho et al, 2014;Whitmore and Mills, 2021). What complicates the work with non-academic partners even more is the lack of required skills in academia (European Commission, 2021a).…”
Section: Open Relations Between Science and Societymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Peer-led interventions to generate positive behavioral changes can be powerful when the complexity of peer relations and social networks are taken into account as well as social learning (e.g., imitation, norms, and positive reinforcement; Veenstra and Laninga-Wijnen et al, 2022). The next step toward improving these efforts is setting up projects in which adolescents are involved in co-designing and co-creating research (Whitmore and Mills, 2021). Not only does this enrich the context in which scientific findings can be launched and interpreted, but crucially informs researchers in important ways, helping them to improve their research designs and paradigms.…”
Section: Integrating Science and Societymentioning
confidence: 99%