2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.02.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Co-creating value from knowledge-intensive business services in manufacturing firms: The moderating role of relationship learning in supplier–customer interactions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
137
0
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 165 publications
(143 citation statements)
references
References 92 publications
3
137
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Product development requires more fixed capital investment but offers more opportunities for developing economies of scale and scope, and make‐or‐buy decisions are made differently (Carman and Langeard, ). Whereas the need for achieving synergies and economies of scale and scope increase the need for collaborative partnerships in product development (Gomes et al, ), the importance of knowing customers’ needs and behaviour to develop appropriate service (Bustinza et al, ) increases the need for strategic KIBS partnerships to foster product–service innovation (Paiola et al, ; Kohtamäki and Partanen, ). We thus view strategic alliances as manufacturers’ preferred method of product–service innovation development, ahead of organic growth.…”
Section: Theoretical Framework and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Product development requires more fixed capital investment but offers more opportunities for developing economies of scale and scope, and make‐or‐buy decisions are made differently (Carman and Langeard, ). Whereas the need for achieving synergies and economies of scale and scope increase the need for collaborative partnerships in product development (Gomes et al, ), the importance of knowing customers’ needs and behaviour to develop appropriate service (Bustinza et al, ) increases the need for strategic KIBS partnerships to foster product–service innovation (Paiola et al, ; Kohtamäki and Partanen, ). We thus view strategic alliances as manufacturers’ preferred method of product–service innovation development, ahead of organic growth.…”
Section: Theoretical Framework and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although previous studies note the importance of strategic partnerships in product innovation and servitisation (Paiola et al, 2013;Kohtam€ aki and Partanen, 2016), evidence on technological strategic collaborations' impact on firm performance is inconclusive and contradictory (Cassiman et al, 2005). Some studies demonstrate empirically positive effects of intraorganisational collaborative innovation arrangements (Colombo and Rabbiosi, 2014); others demonstrate that this relationship depends on type and nature of partnership (Nieto and Santamar ıa, 2007;Faems et al, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Knowledge-intensive services businesses are innovation bridges that interplay with other economic agents acting as purchaser, provider or partner (Czarnitzki & Spielkman, 2003), thus implying an in-depth interaction between the service provider and the end user (Cusumano et al, 2015;Kohtamäki and Partanen, 2016). One example of services provided by KIBS is the management of large samples of digital information, namely big data.…”
Section: Convening Knowledge-intensive Business Services (Kibs)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The renaissance of local manufacturing sectors has been found to result in some cases from the presence of a dynamic knowledge intensive business services sector (KIBS) (Arnold et al, 2016;Kohtamäki and Partanen, 2016). The local presence of knowledge-intensive services has been shown to help new manufacturers internalize the value-adding capacity of services, while at the same time contribute to alleviating operational weaknesses linked to their liability of both newness and smallness (Grönroos & Voima, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The interaction between the actors in the dairy production system, only limits trade relations between the downstream and upstream production chain links, a factor which hinders the value co-creation between the actors, and prevents the sector development (Primo, 1999;Moore, 2006;Lamprinopoulou et al, 2014;Kohtamäki;Partanen, 2016).…”
Section: Introctionmentioning
confidence: 99%