The Handbook of Service Innovation 2015
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4471-6590-3_25
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Co-creative Practices in Service Innovation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0
6

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
22
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…At their heart is a focus on user orientation and contextualization and therefore they do take a cocreation perspective. These methods incorporate the concept of design thinking, which transcends customer participation in the form of surveys or semistructured qualitative interviews to ensure deeper understanding of customer experiences of multidimensional, complex services, often using physical enactments (e.g., “body storming” or role-playing), and context mapping using “make-tools” (drawing and creating physical models with a variety of materials) which can elicit latent needs or feelings (Holmlid 2009). However, we wanted to design a methodology that is enabling and inclusive for all users.…”
Section: Service Design Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At their heart is a focus on user orientation and contextualization and therefore they do take a cocreation perspective. These methods incorporate the concept of design thinking, which transcends customer participation in the form of surveys or semistructured qualitative interviews to ensure deeper understanding of customer experiences of multidimensional, complex services, often using physical enactments (e.g., “body storming” or role-playing), and context mapping using “make-tools” (drawing and creating physical models with a variety of materials) which can elicit latent needs or feelings (Holmlid 2009). However, we wanted to design a methodology that is enabling and inclusive for all users.…”
Section: Service Design Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, human‐centered aspects are not the only ones that are important for service design. They go hand in hand with the multi‐actor, systemic, and participatory considerations that emerge during the service design process using various design tools (Holmlid, 2009; Holmlid, Mattelmäki, Visser, & Vaajakallio, 2015; Kimbell, 2011). Karpen et al (2017) studied service design principles by relating them to individual abilities, design practices, and organizational capabilities.…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The case highlights how co-creation can benefit gaining traction and support within the company for new ideas, bring different departments on board, and aid in the development of the new competencies and capabilities essential to servitization maturity (Holmlid et al 2015). Particularly, co-creation can be a pivotal, positive disruptor in transitioning from product development to PSS-development (Wetter-Edman, Vink, and Blomkvist 2018).…”
Section: Relevance To Development Of Circular Pssmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Co-creation methods enable users and other relevant stakeholders to participate in the design process of new service and product offerings (Holmlid et al 2015;Sanders and Stappers 2008). Co-creation has become well established in recent years (S anchez de la Gu ıa, Cazorla, and de-Miguel-Molina 2017), but to date, this approach has received limited attention from the circular economy community and in the development of circular product-service systems (PSSs) (Lofthouse and Prendeville 2018;Selvefors et al 2019).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%