Co‐design Methods

Caillette-Beaudoin, A.; Cotteret, Marie-Ange; Dubey, Gérard; Gaglio, Gérald; Gambin, Gilles; Iba, Hamza; Soyez, Stéphane

doi:10.1002/9781119388746.ch9

Cited by 2 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Steen 2013is typical of the mainstream customer-centric project level design narratives in lauding the unique aspects of the co-design process, with its (purportedly) "inherent focus on ethics," and the uniqueness of the design perspective compared to science and engineering (for which see Cross 2001;Owen 1997). This narrow methods focus and other assumptions is the dominant reading of co-design (e.g., Caillette-Beaudoin et al 2017). As models for the more complex institutional environments and arrangements of development, such technical approaches have limitations.…”

Section: Co-design: From Customers To Policy and Social Innovationmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…As noted, co-design may involve a range of methods and tools, including modified collective versions of conventional methods, e.g., joint journey mapping (e.g., Caillette-Beaudoin et al 2017). The scope of the term is in this sense somewhat slippery as co-design may refer to a method within a broader approach, e.g., design thinking, or designate itself an approach that articulates into a method portfolio.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Participatory Co-design for Sustainable Development

Melles

2019

Encyclopedia of the UN Sustainable Development Goals

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Although already popular in product and service design, co-design is a more recent entry into the development field. With roots in participatory development and design, co-design is "collective creativity as it is applied across the whole span of a design process" (Sanders and Stappers 2008), where design process can refer to any broad development of service, enterprise, or product. Collective creativity indicates that co-design includes creative approaches or tactics (Lee 2008) to participation, e.g., collaborative visualization, and not just conventional research methods, e.g., interview and focus groups. The approach has its roots in the democratic urge of (Scandinavian) participatory design although it tends to be promoted in design circles as a creative workshop method for product and service innovation. Recent applications, particularly in policy and community settings, have raised the question of power and participation anew (Blomkamp 2018). The practical prompt to these recent discussions regarding the limitations of co-design per se have also been prompted by projects applying

show abstract

Section: Co-design: From Customers To Policy and Social Innovationmentioning

confidence: 99%

mentioning

confidence: 99%