Co-design of Business and IT Services - A Tool-Supported Approach

Pirelli, Blagovesta; Nessler, Natalia; Wegmann, Alain

doi:10.1007/978-3-030-17642-6_3

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 12 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…SEAM has also been mapped to an enterprise architecture method [23], [24]. Current work includes a method and a tool for mapping web-service specifications and service models [25].…”

Section: Mapping 1)mentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparison of Two Value-Modeling Methods: e³ value and SEAM

Kostova

Gordijn

Regev

et al. 2019

2019 13th International Conference on Research Challenges in Information Science (RCIS)

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In the last few decades, several value-modeling methods have emerged in requirements engineering for IS research. We compare two value-modeling methods, e 3 value and SEAM. We illustrate their use with an example of the exchange of the Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) on music. In the process, we propose a comparison framework. The results of our study show that e 3 value and SEAM are similar valuemodeling techniques: both model services in networked systems and focus on value exchanges. They differ, however, in the way value is conceptualized: the market viability of the service system in e 3 value versus the subjective value and lack of market profitability analysis in SEAM. e 3 value shows how value flows from one actor to another, whereas SEAM shows the relative importance of different value propositions and how they are constructed by the service network. These results can be used by modelers to select a value-modeling method for their purposes by proposing explicit selection criteria. The comparison framework, which is in its early stages of development, can be used to compare other modeling methods.

show abstract

“…SEAM has also been mapped to an enterprise architecture method [23], [24]. Current work includes a method and a tool for mapping web-service specifications and service models [25].…”

Section: Mapping 1)mentioning

confidence: 99%