Proceedings of the 26th Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization 2018
DOI: 10.1145/3209219.3209227
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Co-embeddings for Student Modeling in Virtual Learning Environments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Using DL techniques, they obtained significantly better performance than traditional machine learning methods for all three definitions of dropout: participation in the final week, last week of engagement, and participation in the next week. References [29,30] defined dropout as a binary classification problem. Reference [30] combined different DL architectures in a bottom-up manner, selecting three attributes from the dataset as an input.…”
Section: Detecting Undesirable Studentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Using DL techniques, they obtained significantly better performance than traditional machine learning methods for all three definitions of dropout: participation in the final week, last week of engagement, and participation in the next week. References [29,30] defined dropout as a binary classification problem. Reference [30] combined different DL architectures in a bottom-up manner, selecting three attributes from the dataset as an input.…”
Section: Detecting Undesirable Studentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results showed that the proposed model could achieve comparable performance to approaches relying on feature engineering performed by experts. Reference [29] optimized a joint embedding function to represent both students and course elements into a single shared space. The results indicated that coembeddings were able to capture the latent causes involved in dropout, outperforming other disjoint and not embedded representations.…”
Section: Detecting Undesirable Studentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations