2012
DOI: 10.3390/catal2030386
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Co-Fe-Si Aerogel Catalytic Honeycombs for Low Temperature Ethanol Steam Reforming

Abstract: Cobalt talc doped with iron (Fe/Co~0.1) and dispersed in SiO 2 aerogel was prepared from silica alcogel impregnated with metal nitrates by supercritical drying. Catalytic honeycombs were prepared following the same procedure, with the alcogel synthesized directly over cordierite honeycomb pieces. The composite aerogel catalyst was characterized by X-ray diffraction, scanning electron microscopy, focus ion beam, specific surface area and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. The catalytic layer is about 8 µm thick … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[18,19] Recently, researchers are also finding ways to optimize the yield and selectivity of the products at lower temperature ranges over various catalysts. In this regard, various base and noble metals, such as Pt [20][21][22] Ir, [23] Ru, [24] Pd, [25] Rh, [26][27][28][29] Co, [30][31][32][33] Zn, [34] Al, [35] Cu, [36] and Ni [37,38] have been implemented so far for SRE. The activation pathway for ethanol can be influenced by the nature of the metal surface and is generally categorized into two groups i. e. more-oxophilic metal group (Ru, Ni, Rh, Co) that initiates through OÀ H activation and the less-oxophilic metal group (Pt and Pd) where the α-CÀ H activation occurs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[18,19] Recently, researchers are also finding ways to optimize the yield and selectivity of the products at lower temperature ranges over various catalysts. In this regard, various base and noble metals, such as Pt [20][21][22] Ir, [23] Ru, [24] Pd, [25] Rh, [26][27][28][29] Co, [30][31][32][33] Zn, [34] Al, [35] Cu, [36] and Ni [37,38] have been implemented so far for SRE. The activation pathway for ethanol can be influenced by the nature of the metal surface and is generally categorized into two groups i. e. more-oxophilic metal group (Ru, Ni, Rh, Co) that initiates through OÀ H activation and the less-oxophilic metal group (Pt and Pd) where the α-CÀ H activation occurs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ability of base metals, such as Ni [5,7,10,11], Cu [3,7], Al [12], Zn [13], and Co [14][15][16][17], and noble metals, such as Pt [18], Rh [19][20][21][22], Pd [23], Ru [24], and Ir [25], supported on various metal oxides to catalyze the SRE has been widely investigated. Ethanol activation pathways depend on the metal nature, and can be generally divided in two groups: the less-oxophilic metals (Pd and Pt) in which α-C-H activation takes place, and the more-oxophilic metals (Co, Ni, Rh, Ru) that promote activation via O-H.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonsignificant terms in the "Coded Factors" ("Probability F" > 0.1) indicate that this effect has no relevance to the response, and they were not included. Meanwhile, the "Actual Factors" of Table 3 can be used to make predictions about the response for given levels of each factor, replacing them in the quartic model shown in Equation (17). The mathematic model from the "Actual Factors" can be used for simulations in commercial software in order to obtain preliminary energy information about the process.…”
Section: Models Of the Sre From The Rsmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…NRTL-RK was used as thermodynamic package in the simulations in order to simultaneously model condensable and non-condensable compounds present in hydrocarbon reforming [39,77]. This allowed the results of the simulations to be downloaded directly into Excel and used in the mathematical models obtained from the RSM, replacing the "Actual Factors" of Table 3 in Equation (17). The percentage error between the experimental data and the results of the RSM and Aspen Plus integration was calculated according to Equation (21), where Error is the relative error, D exp is the experimental data, and D simu is the result obtained by RSM-Aspen Plus integration.…”
Section: Simulation In Aspen Plus Softwarementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation