2021
DOI: 10.1186/s13068-021-02041-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Co-generation of biohydrogen and biochemicals from co-digestion of Chlorella sp. biomass hydrolysate with sugarcane leaf hydrolysate in an integrated circular biorefinery concept

Abstract: Background A platform for the utilization of the Chlorella sp. biomass and sugarcane leaves to produce multiple products (biorefinery concept) including hydrogen, methane, polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHAs), lipid, and soil supplement with the goal to achieve the zero waste generation (circular economy) is demonstrated in this study. Microalgal biomass were hydrolyzed by mixed enzymes while sugarcane leaves were pretreated with alkali followed by enzyme. Hydrolysates were used to produce hydrogen and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
4
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The MY obtained from this study (199.3 mL-CH 4 /g-VS) are comparable to the yields from other studies, ranging from 81.0 mL-CH 4 /g-VS to 223.6 mL-CH 4 /g-VS. However, the yield obtained from our research is relatively low compared to that of Sitthikitpanya et al [ 50 ] (346.7 mL-CH 4 /g-VS), which could be due to differences in pre-treatment methods and fermentation processes. MY can be influenced by several factors including the type of substrate used, the pre-treatment methods employed, fermentation processes, loading rates of bacteria and organic material, as well as the specific microbial consortium present.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 76%
“…The MY obtained from this study (199.3 mL-CH 4 /g-VS) are comparable to the yields from other studies, ranging from 81.0 mL-CH 4 /g-VS to 223.6 mL-CH 4 /g-VS. However, the yield obtained from our research is relatively low compared to that of Sitthikitpanya et al [ 50 ] (346.7 mL-CH 4 /g-VS), which could be due to differences in pre-treatment methods and fermentation processes. MY can be influenced by several factors including the type of substrate used, the pre-treatment methods employed, fermentation processes, loading rates of bacteria and organic material, as well as the specific microbial consortium present.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 76%
“…This might make the biorefinery system more reliable and enhance the synthesis of various products. For example, producing biobutanol apart from biohydrogen and biomethane [209,210] or improving both fuels' productivity [233,234].…”
Section: Recent Advances and Future Research Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[231,233].Integrated DF and photofermentation techniques are not economically viable as of current research developments, as per Ahmad et al[235] and Urbaniec et al[236]. The study by Ahmad et al examined the possibility of treating liquid pineapple wastes through DF and photo fermentation for biohydrogen production.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Likewise, C. necator TISTR 1335 was fed a combination of Chlorella sp. biomass co-digested with sugarcane leaves to produce 60.9 wt% of PHA which contributes to the zero-waste generation concept ( Sitthikitpanya et al, 2021 ).…”
Section: Microalgae and Bacterial Pha Synthesismentioning
confidence: 99%