2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2014.04.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Co-motion: Making space to care for country

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
57
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
57
0
Order By: Relevance
“…That is, making a shift from learning about the natural world to learning from and within the natural world based on a Yolŋu worldview. Berkes has described this 'synergizing' as a process of bringing into dialogue different ontological knowledge systems (Berkes, 2009) whilst others have termed it 'weaving' (Bartlett et al, 2012) or 'co-motion' (Muller, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That is, making a shift from learning about the natural world to learning from and within the natural world based on a Yolŋu worldview. Berkes has described this 'synergizing' as a process of bringing into dialogue different ontological knowledge systems (Berkes, 2009) whilst others have termed it 'weaving' (Bartlett et al, 2012) or 'co-motion' (Muller, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indigenous Nations, adequately resourced, are able to build their own capacity to engage in the complexities of the rapidly evolving water management realm. Indigenous nations want to see an engagement across epistemologies and ontologies, the sharing of whole world views and institutional insights, rather than a oneway removal of Indigenous knowledge from its context and insertion of it into a mainstream framework (see Muller 2012Muller , 2014. Engaging with Indigenous epistemologies and ontologies as the cultural anchors of Indigenous political authority can inherently change the overarching framework for natural resource management and provide new insight into sustainability (Berkes 1999, Armitage et al 2010, Dolan et al 2015, Rigney et al 2015.…”
Section: Indigenous Engagement In Water Management In Australiamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lane, 2002;Walsh and Mitchell, 2002;Ens and McDonald, 2012). Muller's work (Muller, 2003(Muller, , 2008(Muller, , 2012(Muller, , 2014) offers a window on the utility of Country as a term in environmental management systems, while Rose (Rose, 1988(Rose, , 1996(Rose, , 1999(Rose, , 2004Muir et al, 2010), Graham (Graham, 1999), Weir (Weir, 2009(Weir, , 2012 and others offer insights into the mobilisation of Country as an important trope in Indigenous thinking in Australia. Drawing on this literature in the Australian context, it has been argued that 'the outcome of natural disasters is often mediated by the unnatural disaster of colonial and post-colonial state policies and practices' (Howitt et al, 2012: 48).…”
Section: The Idea Of Country In Indigenous Australiamentioning
confidence: 99%