1989
DOI: 10.1039/c39890000488
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Co-operativity effects between adjacent metal sites—kinetics of methyl iodide addition to pyrazolyl-bridged iridium dimers: argument for a concerted mechanism in the reversible two-fragment, two-centre oxidative addition to the cyclo-octa-1,5-diene di-iridium(I) complex [Ir(COD)(µ-pz)]2

Abstract: Addition of Me1 occurs irreversibly to [Ir(CO)2(p-pz)12 [(I), pzH = pyrazole] in two kinetically distinguishable steps (AM, ASS respectively 32 k 2, 40 k 5 kJ mol-l, -152 k 8, -157 k 16 J mol-l K-l); by contrast Me1 and [Ir(C0D)(p-pz)l2 [ ( Z ) , COD = cyclo-octa-1,5-diene]) enter into equilibrium, AG0298 = -5 k 2 kJ mol-1, with AM = 89 k 4 kJ mol-1, A S = 40 k 15 J mol-1 K-1 for the forward reaction, in striking contrast with activation parameters for related reactions including that of (1) and interpretable … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2003
2003

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The activation parameters Δ H I ⧧ = 32 kJ mol -1 and Δ S I ⧧ = −91 J mol -1 K -1 are typical of those seen for addition at either one or two metal centers ,,, and are comparable to values reported for halogenation of the complexes M 2 (CO) 8 L 2 (M = Mn, Re; L = reactions for which ionic halide intermediates were favored …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…The activation parameters Δ H I ⧧ = 32 kJ mol -1 and Δ S I ⧧ = −91 J mol -1 K -1 are typical of those seen for addition at either one or two metal centers ,,, and are comparable to values reported for halogenation of the complexes M 2 (CO) 8 L 2 (M = Mn, Re; L = reactions for which ionic halide intermediates were favored …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…The role of mononuclear rhodium(I) complexes (d 8 ) in olefin hydrogenation and hydroformylation has become a paradigm in this context because detailed kinetics data are available to decipher the progression of molecular steps that combine to close the catalytic cycle. Similar studies on related systems support a coherent mechanistic view of oxidative addition mediated at a single metal site. , In contrast, how corresponding two-center chemistry operates is still very poorly defined, despite the implicit significance of binuclear substrate activation as a model for cooperative intermetallic effects . It is particularly difficult to rule out mononuclear character concealed in a dimer fragmentation/activation/recombination sequence.…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Significant differences on the reactivity of [{M(μ-Pz)(CO) 2 } 2 ] (M = Rh, Ir) complexes toward MeI have been observed. Thus, the rhodium(I) complex does not react with MeI, most probably because the rhodium centers are not basic enough to promote the oxidative-addition reaction, which is more favored for the iridium(I) compound to give the diiridium (II) complex [{Ir(μ-Pz)(CO) 2 } 2 (Me)(I)]. Moreover, [{Rh(μ-Pz)(CO)(P{OPh} 3 )} 2 ] does react with MeI to give the dirhodium(III) complex [{Rh(μ-Pz)(Me)(CO)(P{OPh} 3 )} 2 (μ-I)]I ( 25 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%