1995
DOI: 10.1039/dt9950001461
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Co-ordination chemistry of adenine (HAde): synthesis and characterization of [CuII(tren)(nucleobase)]X2[tren = tris-(2-aminoethyl)amine, X = Cl or NO3] complexes and crystal structure of [CuII(tren)(Ade)]Cl·2H2O

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4 • . 48 For comparison, these angles are 103.5 and 105.6 • in the compound (9H-adenine)•2H 2 O. 49 It is now well-documented that DNA bases can undergo proton shifts while keeping their neutrality and form different tautomers.…”
Section: Description Of Structures [Mn(l-ox)(h 2 O)(7h-pur-jn 9 )] N ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 • . 48 For comparison, these angles are 103.5 and 105.6 • in the compound (9H-adenine)•2H 2 O. 49 It is now well-documented that DNA bases can undergo proton shifts while keeping their neutrality and form different tautomers.…”
Section: Description Of Structures [Mn(l-ox)(h 2 O)(7h-pur-jn 9 )] N ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is well-known that the protonation at N sites in similar cycles, such as nucleobases, does not modify substantially the bond distances, but it enlarges the endocyclic C–N–C angles up to 4° as a consequence of the absence of the lone pair in those N atoms. , In the present case, those angles may be compared to N–N–C angles of the pyrazole ring. In good agreement with the last argument, a systematic enlargement of the latter angle is observed for the three ligands [110.8 vs 107.2° (A ligand), 110.4 vs 106.9° (B ligand), and 110.6 vs 107.8° (C ligand) for C5–N1–N2 and N1–N2–C3 angles, respectively], thus confirming the location of those hydrogen atoms.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…These copper conjugates showed significant growth inhibition in both cell lines (IC 50 values of 3-26 μM). Binuclear copper(II) complexes with 6-(2-chlorobenzylamino)purine, 6-(3-chlorobenzylamino)purine and chloride ions are found to be several times more potent than the mononuclear complex against human malignant melanoma G361 and human osteogenic sarcoma HOS cell lines with IC 50 values ranging from 20 to 88 μM [58].…”
Section: In Vitro Cytotoxic Activitymentioning
confidence: 98%