2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.erss.2020.101876
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Co-production in the wind energy sector: A systematic literature review of public engagement beyond invited stakeholder participation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 121 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To review the evidence on this topic, there are some essential principles that are common in the process of writing systematic and critical reviews [47,48]. These reviews aim for comprehensiveness, while reducing bias regarding literature searches [47]; and, they are being increasingly used in the field of energy social science [24,[49][50][51]. The review process pursued the following steps.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To review the evidence on this topic, there are some essential principles that are common in the process of writing systematic and critical reviews [47,48]. These reviews aim for comprehensiveness, while reducing bias regarding literature searches [47]; and, they are being increasingly used in the field of energy social science [24,[49][50][51]. The review process pursued the following steps.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stakeholder engagement in the energy sector can take different forms. Currently, these include intervention by non-profit and community organizations in regulatory proceedings, public comments on infrastructure siting decisions, and technical advisory groups established by regulators on specific topics (Baldwin et al 2018, Solman et al 2021. A full review of stakeholder engagement practices is out-of-scope here, but this topic deserves additional attention in the context of questions about procedural and distributional equity that have been documented by other researchers in infrastructure planning efforts (Sovacool et al 2016, Heffron and McCauley 2017, Fletcher et al 2022.…”
Section: Multi-stakeholder Engagementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the discussion above, the main issue hindering wind energy technology transfer amongst EU member states, and from EU members to other nations outside the EU, is intellectual property transfer with a focus on who should bear the cost associated with sharing the technology [142,143]. Developed nations are unwilling to share their wind energy technologies because they feel that it is not in their best interest with regards to innovation.…”
Section: Technology Transfer and Ipr Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%