2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfe.2016.03.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Co-production of forestry science and society: Evolving interpretations of economic sustainability in Finnish forestry textbooks

Abstract: a b s t r a c tIn this article, we explore how forestry scientists have promoted and defended particular definitions of economic sustainability as a response to socio-economic challenges. Drawing on an analysis of Finnish forestry textbooks, we discuss the evolving conceptualizations in terms of co-production of scientific ideas and social orders. We argue that to fully understand what economic sustainability means in forestry one has to analyze the choices and preferences concerning the components of scientif… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, several authors agree that the components of sustainability are economy, society, and environment, which together work towards the long-term prosperity of territories and their communities [33,46,47]. From this trilogy, terms such as circular economy, social innovation, green innovation, eco-innovation, green consumption, among others, have been incorporated, which gives an idea of the plethora of interpretations that accompanies sustainable development [33,[47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57][58][59].…”
Section: Sustainable Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, several authors agree that the components of sustainability are economy, society, and environment, which together work towards the long-term prosperity of territories and their communities [33,46,47]. From this trilogy, terms such as circular economy, social innovation, green innovation, eco-innovation, green consumption, among others, have been incorporated, which gives an idea of the plethora of interpretations that accompanies sustainable development [33,[47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57][58][59].…”
Section: Sustainable Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To understand the historical context concerning the emergence of the natural disturbance-based management approach, it is useful to review the development of forest management methods over the past century (Figure 1). In general and through time, changes in management approaches have reflected societal needs for different kinds of forest resources and fears of their depletion; furthermore, they are a product of technological and methodological advances, and growing knowledge in ecological and forest sciences (Rytteri et al, 2016). The idea of natural disturbance-based management is paradoxical in that natural disturbances have typically been considered the foresters' worst enemy, and basing forest management on natural disturbance patterns may be difficult for managers to accept (Kuuluvainen and Grenfell, 2012).…”
Section: Historical Development and Current Policy Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a consequence, while hosting only 2% of the global forest area, Swedish and Finnish sawn wood and paper export make up more than 15% globally (SNS, 2020). The established model of intensive forestry is considered sustainable from the point of view of timber, pulp and biomass yield (Rytteri et al, 2016). However, such a definition of sustainability does not meet current national and international standards, in particular because it does not address the fact that a large part of forest biodiversity is in jeopardy (Hanski, 2000;Kontula and Raunio, 2018;Hyvärinen et al, 2019;SLU ArtDataBanken, 2020), nor does it recognize the steeply declining role of intensive forestry and forest industry for regional and rural sustainability (Angelstam et al, 2020b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The concept of sustainability has been modified and updated due, among other reasons, to the changes in the role played by forests in society [66,67]. Besides that, the demand for goods and services coming from forest systems has been continuously increasing [68], meaning that, today, forest management is much more polyhedral (or multi-faceted, according to [69]) than it was three centuries ago, and includes other ecosystem services not contemplated in the original idea of sustainability, such as in the case of biodiversity [70].…”
Section: Theory Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%