2021
DOI: 10.3390/su13179931
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CO2 Responses of Winter Wheat, Barley and Oat Cultivars under Optimum and Limited Irrigation

Abstract: Field crop production must adapt to the challenges generated by the negative consequences of climate change. Yield loss caused by abiotic stresses could be counterbalanced by increasing atmospheric CO2 concentration, but C3 plant species and varieties have significantly different reactions to CO2. To examine the responses of wheat, barley and oat varieties to CO2 enrichment in combination with simulated drought, a model experiment was conducted under controlled environmental conditions. The plants were grown i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Bocharnikova et al [ 39 ] also reported similar results with their research, which sought to determine the effect of silicon fertilizer on the drought resistance of barley. Findings by Farkas et al [ 40 ] based on silicon application research in the winter oat variety ‘Mv Hópehely’, also supports our findings regarding the positive effect of Si fertilization on water use efficiency.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Bocharnikova et al [ 39 ] also reported similar results with their research, which sought to determine the effect of silicon fertilizer on the drought resistance of barley. Findings by Farkas et al [ 40 ] based on silicon application research in the winter oat variety ‘Mv Hópehely’, also supports our findings regarding the positive effect of Si fertilization on water use efficiency.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…A decline in leaf N implies that herbivores will depend largely on N-deficient foliage (Coley et al 2002) and this may need a change of feeding habits (Farkas et al 2021) and increased foliage intake to compensate for N deficiency (Jayawardena et al 2021). A decline in leaf N content implied that eCO 2 may reduce decomposition rate of the leaf litter as well as N cycling (Norby et al 1999).…”
Section: Woody Plant Responses To Varying Eco 2 Concentrationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is predicted that atCO 2 may rise as high as 936 μmol mol −1 by the year 2100 if greenhouse gas emissions are not mitigated (Hu et al 2018). The increase in atCO 2 has serious impacts on plant physiology, productivity, growth, water relations (Bhargava and Mitra 2021;Zhang et al 2021) and foliage chemistry (Du et al 2020;Farkas et al 2021). AtCO 2 , through CO 2 fertilization, directly increases growth, canopy density and biomass by enhancing photosynthesis (Baig et al 2015) and indirectly by reducing transpiration via partial closure of stomata (Gonsamo et al 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It was confirmed that the elevation of the CO 2 could be positive to plant development and production and the CO 2 enrichment could counterbalance the negative impact of drought [9]. The responses of various cereal varieties to elevated CO 2 concentration were studied under optimum and limited water availability [10]. The CO 2 treatments were combined with the simulation of drought in two phenophases of cereals and the productivity of the plants as well as the water use efficiency was determined.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%