2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.egypro.2017.03.1767
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CO2stCap - Cutting Cost of CO2 Capture in Process Industry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The (NORDICCS, 2017) project has evaluated the potential of using waste heat from cement industry to cover the reboiler duty of the stripper for an aminebased CO2 capture plant and concluded that utilisation of waste heat is necessary in order to lower the cost of CO2 capture. The CO2stCap project (Skagestad et al, 2017) is in progress in Norway and Sweden to evaluate different possibilities for partial CO2 capture from industrial sources.…”
Section: Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The (NORDICCS, 2017) project has evaluated the potential of using waste heat from cement industry to cover the reboiler duty of the stripper for an aminebased CO2 capture plant and concluded that utilisation of waste heat is necessary in order to lower the cost of CO2 capture. The CO2stCap project (Skagestad et al, 2017) is in progress in Norway and Sweden to evaluate different possibilities for partial CO2 capture from industrial sources.…”
Section: Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…CCS can be applied to either the silicon and aluminum processes, but in many ways the silicon process is better suited as the concentration of CO 2 in the flue gas around 3-4% [24,25]. This is at the low end for existing carbon capture solutions, so further up-concentration would make this stream more feasible for carbon capture.…”
Section: Reducing the Emissions From Aluminum And Silicon Productionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, wood charcoal) . In addition to these measures, CCS could further decrease CO 2 emissions of integrated steel mills . Post-combustion capture can avoid 50–60% of the CO 2 emissions, assuming a 90% capture rate using MEA regardless of the varying gas CO 2 content. , Some of the gas streams ( e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pulp and paper industry is an energy-intensive sector with most of the CO 2 emissions arising from the combustion of biomass onsite . Coupling the pulp and paper production process with CCS could have the potential to provide net removal of atmospheric CO 2 , that is, negative emissions as a bioenergy with CCS (BECCS) technology. , Studies indicate that post-combustion capture of CO 2 from the recovery boiler, and bark boiler flue gases offer the greatest CO 2 reduction potential. The recovery boiler accounts for as much as 70–80% of the emissions for a pulp mill . Absorption-based CO 2 capture is often considered due to the low CO 2 concentration of 12–13% mol in the flue gases from the recovery boilers, ,, which is similar to coal flue gas (12–14 % mol CO 2 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation