2022
DOI: 10.1080/19357397.2022.2060703
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coach-athlete relationship, social support, and sport-related psychological well-being in National Collegiate Athletic Association Division I student-athletes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, the instructor/coach has no significant effect on regular participation, athletic potential, focus and discipline, resiliency and humility, harmony and unity, and the health status of student-athletes. Results of the analysis opposed previously conducted studies on the positive effect of instructor/coach on the frequency of participation of student-athletes (Manzoor, 2018;Wekesser et al, 2021), the potential of athletes through feedbacks (Sumarna et al, 2017;U zu m, 2018), focus and discipline (Goffena & Horn, 2021), resiliency and humility (Balcombe & De Leo, 2021;Brandt, 2018;Lu et al, 2016), harmony and unity (Freire et al, 2022;Vahdani et al, 2012), and their health status (Bissett et al, 2020;Powers et al, 2020;Simons & Bird, 2022).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…On the other hand, the instructor/coach has no significant effect on regular participation, athletic potential, focus and discipline, resiliency and humility, harmony and unity, and the health status of student-athletes. Results of the analysis opposed previously conducted studies on the positive effect of instructor/coach on the frequency of participation of student-athletes (Manzoor, 2018;Wekesser et al, 2021), the potential of athletes through feedbacks (Sumarna et al, 2017;U zu m, 2018), focus and discipline (Goffena & Horn, 2021), resiliency and humility (Balcombe & De Leo, 2021;Brandt, 2018;Lu et al, 2016), harmony and unity (Freire et al, 2022;Vahdani et al, 2012), and their health status (Bissett et al, 2020;Powers et al, 2020;Simons & Bird, 2022).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…An increasing number of athletes are reporting symptoms of burnout ( Madigan et al, 2022 ), and previous research indicates that an individual’s contextual environment ( González-Morales et al, 2012 ) and social support ( Lu et al, 2016 ; Simons and Bird, 2022 ) can influence levels of athlete burnout and wellbeing. As such, the availability of the TBQ to assess the potential influence an athlete’s perceptions of his/her teammates’ burnout on the individual athlete ( Appleby et al, 2018 ) is a timely contribution to burnout research.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mediating roles of pre-competitive coping and affective states in the relationships between coach-athlete relationship, satisfaction and attainment of achievement goals Coach-athlete relationship (CAR) has been linked to a wide range of variables connected to performance and athletes' wellbeing, such as: affects, coping and sports satisfaction (Davis & Jowett, 2014;González-García et al, 2022;Haugan et al, 2021;Simons & Bird, 2022).…”
Section: Running Head: Coach-athlete Relationship Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, this theoretical construct has attracted the attention of the coaching research within the last two decades (Haugan et al, 2021;Jowett & Cockerill, 2003;Jowett & Ntoumanis, 2004;Simons & Bird, 2022). The 3C is a prominent model examining CAR and is mainly focused on the dynamic interrelations between the coach and athletes and their mutual influence (Jowett & Cockerill, 2003).…”
Section: Running Head: Coach-athlete Relationship Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 99%