2008
DOI: 10.1598/rt.62.3.8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coaching Reading Buddies for Success

Abstract: Reading buddies have been used by teachers for many years. The practice and benefits of having older students reading with younger students on a regular basis has been well documented. This article provides suggestions for teachers as they begin a reading buddy program and includes ideas for meaningful follow‐up activities that will help keep students on task, reinforce the purpose of their time together, and improve the comprehension of both reading buddies. لقد استخدم المدرّسون زملاء القراءة لسنوات كثيرة وقد… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There have been a number of studies on tutoring programs for reading skills. Many of these programs took place in schools and run throughout the school year (Block & Dellamura, 2001;Burns, Senesac, & Silberglitt, 2008;Fitzgerald, 2001;Gattis et al, 2001;LaGue & Wilson, 2010;Marious, 2000;Paterson & Elliott, 2006;Theurer & Schmidt, 2008;Vadasy, Jenkins, Antil, Wayne, & O'Connor, 1997). Several programs specifically targeted students at risk of reading failure (Burns et al, 2008;Fitzgerald, 2001;Gattis et al, 2001;LaGue & Wilson, 2010;Paterson & Elliott, 2006;Vadasy et al, 1997).…”
Section: Reading Partner Programsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…There have been a number of studies on tutoring programs for reading skills. Many of these programs took place in schools and run throughout the school year (Block & Dellamura, 2001;Burns, Senesac, & Silberglitt, 2008;Fitzgerald, 2001;Gattis et al, 2001;LaGue & Wilson, 2010;Marious, 2000;Paterson & Elliott, 2006;Theurer & Schmidt, 2008;Vadasy, Jenkins, Antil, Wayne, & O'Connor, 1997). Several programs specifically targeted students at risk of reading failure (Burns et al, 2008;Fitzgerald, 2001;Gattis et al, 2001;LaGue & Wilson, 2010;Paterson & Elliott, 2006;Vadasy et al, 1997).…”
Section: Reading Partner Programsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The tutors also impacted the effectiveness of the programs. The age of tutors does not appear to be an important factor: programs with volunteers who were peers (LaGue & Wilson, 2010), older students (Block & Dellamura, 2001;Marious, 2000;Paterson & Elliot, 2006;Theurer & Schmidt, 2008), college students (Fitzgerald, 2001), adults (Jalongo, 2005), or a mix of community volunteers (Gattis et al, 2010;Vadasy et al, 1997), all showed improvements in students' reading. In all of these studies, tutors received some form of training.…”
Section: Reading Partner Programsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This study was primarily influenced by previous studies demonstrating the benefits of buddy reading (e.g., Friedland & Truesdell, 2006;Kreuger & Braun, 1998;Mak et al, 2008) and reading picture books (e.g., Louie & Sierschynski, 2015;Sheu, 2008;Sun, 2015). To begin with, buddy reading is a reading approach that involves students reading books to a partner who may be younger or at a lower reading proficiency level (e.g., Mak et al, 2008;Shegar, 2009;Theurer & Schmidt, 2008). It does not need to follow a standard implementation format (Shegar, 2009), which gives teachers considerable flexibility in adapting this instructive activity for their students based on their curricula and students' reading proficiency.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was limited to 3 days because a short-term, intensive camp was technically more feasible in the target school during the winter vacation. To plan the camp and its curriculum, the researchers referred to studies on buddy reading (e.g., Friedland & Truesdell, 2004;Kreuger & Braun, 1998;Mak et al, 2008;Shegar, 2009;Theurer & Schmidt, 2008) and included two main pedagogical stages, buddy reading and buddy writing (see Figure 1), which involved nine lessons in total (see Table 1). All of the activities were implemented mainly by the first author, and the second author and another teaching assistant acted as student supervisors, circulating in the classroom to monitor and assist the students most of the time.…”
Section: Conceptualization Of the Literacy Buddy Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%