1989
DOI: 10.1099/00222615-28-1-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coaggregation of black-pigmented Bacteroides species with other oral bacteria

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It was also found that prevotellae and streptococci were the genera that most often coaggregated with multiple bacterial species in the present study (Table 3). This finding is in agreement with previous studies, which showed that streptococci and prevotellae (previously Bacteroides) are widely recognized as coaggregation partners by other species (3,16,19,20). However, coaggregation between streptococci and staphylococci has never been reported before.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
“…It was also found that prevotellae and streptococci were the genera that most often coaggregated with multiple bacterial species in the present study (Table 3). This finding is in agreement with previous studies, which showed that streptococci and prevotellae (previously Bacteroides) are widely recognized as coaggregation partners by other species (3,16,19,20). However, coaggregation between streptococci and staphylococci has never been reported before.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
“…These were also isolated from a relatively high number of the subjects and in high proportion after P. intermedia (table 4). These organisms have been shown to play an important role in the formation of dental plaque through their ability to extensively coaggregate with many other oral microorganisms [13][14][15][16][17]. Since supragingival plaque can harbor putative periopathogens, as demonstrated in this study, it is conceivable to speculate that it probably plays an important role as a reservoir for such organisms and consequently may lead to the spread to, or reinfection of, subgingival sites [18].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…2, 26, 46 Other studies describe similar phenomena of strain-specific interactions for Actinomyces species with different Streptococci 25, 28 as well as a number of additional oral bacterial species. 29, 30, 47 In addition to Fap2, several adhesins involved in some of these interactions have been identified including SspA/B in the binding of S. gordonii with P. gingivalis 48 and the fusobacterial RadD in the interaction between F. nucleatum and Streptococcal species as well as Actinomyces . 13 However, most studies have only investigated individual strains for each of the species involved and comprehensive studies including multiple isolates are still lacking.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies of different oral bacterial interactions have demonstrated that coaggregation involves highly specific cell-to-cell recognition of distinct isolates of a certain species and that this pattern is not generalizable to all strains of a single species or all species of a genus. Other examples of these differential binding specificities include Actinomyces naeslundii with different strains of Streptococcus sanguinis and Streptococcus gordonii , 25, 27, 28, 29 P. gingivalis binding with Veillonella, Capnocytophaga and Actinomyces but not with Streptococcus , 30 intra- and intergenic coaggregations between Streptococcus and Actinomyces 31 among others.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%