1965
DOI: 10.1002/aic.690110309
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coalescence of liquid droplets in two‐component–two‐phase systems: Part I. Effect of physical properties on the rate of coalescence

Abstract: Experimental coalescence time and time distribution studies of the coalescence of a single droplet a t a plane interface are presented for four hvo-component-two-phase systems. The results have been analyzed by dimensional analysis and statistical analysis, and a correlation of coalescence time and coalescence time distribution with the physical properties of the system is proposed.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
23
0

Year Published

1970
1970
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For higher approach velocities the rupture threshold may not be reached and the strain energy can reverse the bubble motion (rebound) and the film begins to thicken. At low approach velocities the rate of increase in contact area is slow enough to allow drainage and rupture [36]. In general, in the presence of ultrasound, an increase in frequency (at high frequencies) and the acoustic pressure increases the secondary Bjerknes force and the approach velocity [37].…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For higher approach velocities the rupture threshold may not be reached and the strain energy can reverse the bubble motion (rebound) and the film begins to thicken. At low approach velocities the rate of increase in contact area is slow enough to allow drainage and rupture [36]. In general, in the presence of ultrasound, an increase in frequency (at high frequencies) and the acoustic pressure increases the secondary Bjerknes force and the approach velocity [37].…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This could imply that highly viscous fluids inhibit bubble surface motion and film drainage between the bubbles in contact, which is known to reduce coalescence [213]. However, the time for coalescence to occur becomes relevant in an ultrasound environment due to time dependant forces on the bubbles [36]. Numerical analysis of a two bubble system suggests that increasing the viscosity of the liquid, in this case sulfuric acid, would decrease the secondary Bjerknes force, approach velocity and therefore increase contact time [245].…”
Section: Surface Tension and Viscositymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a drop or bubble approaches an interface, it develops a dimple: the film is thicker at its center than at its rim (Derjaguin and Kussakov, 1939;Allan et al, 1961;Platikanov, 1964;Hartland, 1967Hartland, , 1969Hartland and Wood, 1973;Hodgson and Woods, 1969;Burrill and Woods, 1973). Models concerned with the shape of the film as a drop or bubble approaches a fluid-fluid interface have been discussed by Chappelear (1961), by Charles and Mason (1960), by Jeffreys and Hawksley (1965), and by Lang and Wilke (1971). Our concern here will be the simpler case of a drop or bubble approaching a solid surface.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Quantitative studies for multiple-drop systems have been confined to agitated vessels (8,10,13, 17,18). The techniques used usually involved some type of drop tracer study requiring an indirect method of observation and contamination of the liquid system with a tracer.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%