2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jocs.2011.08.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coarse-grid treatment in parallel AMG for coupled systems in CFD applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Any parallel multigrid or algebraic multigrid solver needs a carefully designed bottom level solver [11]. Typically, only few unknowns per process are left on the coarsest grid, making it difficult, if not impossible, to achieve good scalability for that part of the algorithm.…”
Section: Algorithm Redesignmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Any parallel multigrid or algebraic multigrid solver needs a carefully designed bottom level solver [11]. Typically, only few unknowns per process are left on the coarsest grid, making it difficult, if not impossible, to achieve good scalability for that part of the algorithm.…”
Section: Algorithm Redesignmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, our solver must be robust enough for meshes with a quality typical for industrial applications. We prefer therefore to construct our own solver based on the experience we had with both, segregated (elliptic) problems, see Emans [6,8], and coupled problems of another kind, see Emans [11,13].…”
Section: Numerical Solution Of the Linear Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[5,7,16,18,19,21]. In general, the agglomeration methods require a-priori specification of when agglomeration should occur and how aggressive it should be.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We note that this may in part be due to the problem-and machine-dependent nature of the scalability issues connected with coarse-level solvers. For a range of problems containing less than about 3M unknowns and scaling using up to 32 cores, a comparison of using a parallel LU factorization, an iterative method, and an agglomeration strategy together with algebraic multigrid has indicated that agglomeration is a superior approach [7]. For medium-sized problems containing approximately 25M unknowns on 4096 cores, the benefits of using agglomeration compared to an iterative coarselevel solver combined with smoothed aggregation algebraic multigrid on 4096 cores was demonstrated in [16], with an overall solver speed-up of 1.8 being reported.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%