1998
DOI: 10.1007/s001380050075
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coarse-to-fine adaptive masks for appearance matching of occluded scenes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In terms of the immediate future of recognition systems, representation modules in computer vision will probably draw on the knowledge that is contained in the computer graphics field, possibly utilizing subdivision and multiresolution schemes which have emerged as major topics in that area. In addition, it is obvious that there is a glaring lack of methods in the current literature which have the ability to represent and [19] Splines Y Y 9 100% SAI [31] Angles Y ---Splash [59] Surface normals Y Y 9 -Point signatures [18] Distance Y Y 15 100% Spin images [33] Surface histogram Y Y 4 100% Greenspan [26] Voxels Y Y 5 -COSMOS [20] SSF N Y 30 97% Crease angle [6] Crease angles Y N 4 92% [21] Occlusion masks Y Y 6 89% Leonardis [41] Robust est. Y Y 20 75% Ohba [50] Eigenwindows Y N --OLIVER [54] Probabilistic models Y ---Mokhtarian [46] CSS Y Y 15 100% Vijayakumar [66] Silhouettes Y Y --Chen [14] Internal edges Y Y 60 -Sullivan [62] Errors N -2 100%…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In terms of the immediate future of recognition systems, representation modules in computer vision will probably draw on the knowledge that is contained in the computer graphics field, possibly utilizing subdivision and multiresolution schemes which have emerged as major topics in that area. In addition, it is obvious that there is a glaring lack of methods in the current literature which have the ability to represent and [19] Splines Y Y 9 100% SAI [31] Angles Y ---Splash [59] Surface normals Y Y 9 -Point signatures [18] Distance Y Y 15 100% Spin images [33] Surface histogram Y Y 4 100% Greenspan [26] Voxels Y Y 5 -COSMOS [20] SSF N Y 30 97% Crease angle [6] Crease angles Y N 4 92% [21] Occlusion masks Y Y 6 89% Leonardis [41] Robust est. Y Y 20 75% Ohba [50] Eigenwindows Y N --OLIVER [54] Probabilistic models Y ---Mokhtarian [46] CSS Y Y 15 100% Vijayakumar [66] Silhouettes Y Y --Chen [14] Internal edges Y Y 60 -Sullivan [62] Errors N -2 100%…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…. , u p ] (usually only p, p < n, eigenvectors are sufficient), an unknown sample x ∈ IR m can be reconstructed bỹ [17,18,19,20]). But since these methods are computationally very expensive (i.e., they are based on iterative algorithms) or can handle only a small amount of noise, they are often not applicable in practice.…”
Section: Fast-robust Pcamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to its least squares formulation, PCA is highly sensitive to outliers. Thus, several methods for robustly learning PCA subspaces (e.g., [12,13,14,15,16]) as well as for robustly estimating the PCA coefficients (e.g., [17,18,19,20]) have been proposed. In this paper, we are focusing on the latter case.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Edwards and Murase [4] introduced a modification of the PCA technique, where robustness to partial occlusion was achieved by excluding all image pixels from the subspace projection that constituted occluded image areas. They developed an (coarse-to-fine) adaptive masking concept that enabled a robust calculation of the subspace representation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To a certain extent our approach bears similarities with the approach of Edwards and Murase [4]; however, instead of simply excluding image pixels that constitute occluded image areas (i.e., masking the image with a binary mask), it weights each image pixel according to a confidence measure that quantifies the confidence that the pixel in question represents an outlier. By doing so, it reduces (or eliminates) the impact of the occluded pixels on the subspace representation of the given face image and adds robustness to partial occlusions of the underlying subspace projection technique.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%