2015
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-14612-6_6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coarse-to-Fine Minimization of Some Common Nonconvexities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To deal with more severe nuisances, several works [60,109] proposed to use discontinuous functions, such as ℓ 0 or inlier count. Instead of using a single function, many works propose to use continuation methods to deform the cost function as the optimization progresses in order to increase robustness and reduce the chance of getting caught in bad local minima [16,72]. In practice, however, it is a challenge to decide which penalty function is suitable for the problem at hand.…”
Section: Optimization In Computer Visionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To deal with more severe nuisances, several works [60,109] proposed to use discontinuous functions, such as ℓ 0 or inlier count. Instead of using a single function, many works propose to use continuation methods to deform the cost function as the optimization progresses in order to increase robustness and reduce the chance of getting caught in bad local minima [16,72]. In practice, however, it is a challenge to decide which penalty function is suitable for the problem at hand.…”
Section: Optimization In Computer Visionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, without additional heuristics such as restricting the finer solution to be around the solution of the coarse problem, there is no guarantee that coarse structure is preserved when solving the finer problem. Recently, [33] provided analysis and derived closed form solutions for the smoothing of the objective in problems of point cloud matching. Our method uses a single energy integrating over a continuum of scales in parallel, rather than a sequential approach where multiple energies from coarse to fine are solved.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, most segmentation methods (e.g., [6,25,2]) based on scale spaces consider global scale spaces that are computed on the whole image, which does not capture the fact that there exist multiple regions of the segmentation at different scales, and this could lead to the removal and/or displacement of important structures in the image, for instance, when large structures are blurred across small ones, leading to an inaccurate segmentation. Second, algorithms that use a coarse-to-fine principle (e.g., [5,33]) do so sequentially (see Figure 1) so that the algorithm operates at the coarser scale and then uses the result to initialize computation at a finer scale. While this warm start may influence the finer scale result, there is no guarantee that the coarse structure of the segmentation is preserved in the final solution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, without additional heuristics such as restricting the finer solution to be around the solution of the coarse problem, there is no guarantee that coarse structure is preserved when solving the finer problem. Recently, [10] provided analysis and derived closed form solutions for the smoothing of the objective in problems of point cloud matching. Our method uses a single energy integrating over a continuum of scales in parallel, and we optimize this energy directly.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, most segmentation methods (e.g., [5,6,7,8]) based on scale spaces consider scale spaces that are globally computed on the whole image, which does not capture the fact that there exist multiple regions of the segmentation at different scales, and this could lead to the removal and/or displacement of important structures in the image, for instance, when large structures are blurred across small ones, leading to an inaccurate segmentation. Second, algorithms that use a coarse-to-fine principle (e.g., [9,10]) do so sequentially (see Figure 2) so that the algorithm operates at the coarser scale and then uses the result to initialize computation at a finer scale. While this warm start may influence the finer scale result, there is no guarantee that the coarse structure of the segmentation is preserved in the final solution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%