2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsames.2007.10.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coastal nutrification in Brazil: A review of the role of nutrient excess on coral reef demise

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
33
6
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 119 publications
3
33
6
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Huang et al (2011), in a study has concluded growth of zoanthid colonies is favoured by nutrient enrichment and increased organic matter concentration. Similar results have been reported by Costa et al (2008) (2008) which reported dominance of zoanthid colonies under hypertrophic, faecal-polluted conditions. The reason for low zoanthid growth despite hypertrophic nutrient conditions could be due to the competition given by extensive growth of macroalgae at both these sites, similar to the studies of Emanuelle et al (2015), where a negative correlation has been obtained between macroalgae and zoanthids.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Huang et al (2011), in a study has concluded growth of zoanthid colonies is favoured by nutrient enrichment and increased organic matter concentration. Similar results have been reported by Costa et al (2008) (2008) which reported dominance of zoanthid colonies under hypertrophic, faecal-polluted conditions. The reason for low zoanthid growth despite hypertrophic nutrient conditions could be due to the competition given by extensive growth of macroalgae at both these sites, similar to the studies of Emanuelle et al (2015), where a negative correlation has been obtained between macroalgae and zoanthids.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…N = 10, mean ± SE Over the last few years, there has been an intense debate about the varying effects of nutrification on corals (Szmant 2002;Loya and Kramarsky-Winter 2003;Rinkevich et al 2003). While most authors agree that coastal nutrification and sedimentation are deleterious at the ecosystem level (reviewed in Fabricius 2005) by shifting the ecological balance between corals and space-competing macroalgae Costa et al 2008) in the absence of herbivores (McCook 1999;Jompa and McCook 2002), some suggest increased nutrient levels may, paradoxically, have positive effects on the metabolic performance of some corals . Here, near-shore individuals of the common S. subseriata were found to outperform mid-shelf specimens in terms of nutritional status, P g and G, and withstand adverse conditions of increased suspended sediment loads with no signs of respiratory and photophysiological stress.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Eutrophication is one of the major threats to coral reefs (Jackson et al 2001) affecting coral health and community composition (McCook 1999;Nyström et al 2000;Fabricius 2005) and the ecological balance between corals and space-competing macroalgae (McCook 1999;Costa et al 2008). The ability of coastal corals to adapt to changing nutrient and sediment loads can be highly variable between species (Fabricius 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Organic pollution in moderate quantities may benefit sponges by providing nutrients for heterotrophic bacteria which are a food source for sponges which feed by filtration, targeting mainly ultraplankton (Rüt-zler 2004). A positive relationship of sponge biomass with organic pollution and high sediment load has been accepted by several authors (Chalker et al 1985, Rogers 1990, Wilkinson & Cheshire 1990, Ward-Paige et al 2005, Costa et al 2008. Concerning nutrient and sediment increases, sponges and corals can be considered as opposites, with coral biomass decreasing in reefs stressed by pollution and siltation (Aerst & van Soest 1997, Nughes & Roberts 2003a.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%