1977
DOI: 10.1021/ja00450a042
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cobalt(III)-promoted hydrolysis of a phosphate ester

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

2
29
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
2
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The 6-membered chelate ring lies in the same plane as the coordinated O atoms, and chelation of the HPO 4 2À ligand is confirmed. The O1-Co1-O2 angle of 76.118 is comparable to that found in other structurally characterized mononuclear Co III complexes containing chelated phosphate-these range from 75.468 to 76.608 [27][28][29][30] 1.540 to 1.548 ). [31] This lengthening is consistent with protonation at an exo (uncoordinated) O atom, and a careful search of the Fourier map found a peak attributable to an H atom close to only this O atom.…”
supporting
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The 6-membered chelate ring lies in the same plane as the coordinated O atoms, and chelation of the HPO 4 2À ligand is confirmed. The O1-Co1-O2 angle of 76.118 is comparable to that found in other structurally characterized mononuclear Co III complexes containing chelated phosphate-these range from 75.468 to 76.608 [27][28][29][30] 1.540 to 1.548 ). [31] This lengthening is consistent with protonation at an exo (uncoordinated) O atom, and a careful search of the Fourier map found a peak attributable to an H atom close to only this O atom.…”
supporting
confidence: 81%
“…The 6-membered chelate ring lies in the same plane as the coordinated O atoms, and chelation of the HPO 4 2À ligand is confirmed. The O1-Co1-O2 angle of 76.118 is comparable to that found in other structurally characterized mononuclear Co III complexes containing chelated phosphate-these range from 75.468 to 76.608 [27][28][29][30] -and the overall geometry of the chelated HPO 4 2À ligand is quite similar to the chelated PO 4 3À ligands in these complexes. The most notable exception is the P-O exo bond to the protonated O atom; at 1.553 , this is significantly longer than the P-O exo bonds in the other complexes (range from 1.499 to 1.523 ) and is comparable to the P À O bond lengths in the dimeric complex [(trpn)COMMUNICATION 1.540 to 1.548 ).…”
supporting
confidence: 80%
“…In comparison, acetylene and ethylene dissociate on the iron surface via CH x radicals with an activation energy of about 0.6 -1.4 eV. 50 Without experimental estimation of the activation energy, mass diffusion was proposed as the limited process by Zhu et al 23 and Louchev et al 35 These results illustrate the diversity between the attributed underlying mechanisms that determine the apparent activation energy. It is fair to say that the growth process is not fully understood and the variation of the activation energy between 0.1 and 2 eV reflect the strong influence that different process parameters have on the growth mechanism.…”
Section: Growth Rate and Activation Energymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of metal complexes that mimic the structure and function of a metalloenzyme is a well-established approach in bioinorganic chemistry to develop highly effective catalysts modeled after nature and to gain a molecular level understanding of the enzymatic mechanism. In the late 1970s and 1980s pioneering work by the groups of Sargeson (Anderson et al, 1977; Jones et al, 1983; Hendry and Sargeson, 1989), Breslow (Gellman et al, 1986; Breslow et al, 1989), and Chin (Chin, 1991) among others gave the first insight into the role of the metal ion(s) in the mechanisms of phosphoester hydrolysis by metallohydrolases. Using phosphate esters with good leaving groups and kinetically inert mononuclear Co(III) complexes, metal-catalyzed hydrolysis reactions were shown to proceed through the following mechanisms: (i) Lewis acid activation, in which the metal polarizes the P-O bond and activates the phosphorus for nucleophilic attack (Figure 1A); (ii) metal hydroxide activation, in which the metal generates (metal-bound) hydroxide to act as an efficient nucleophile at pH 7 or as a general base (Figures 1B,C); (iii) stabilization of the leaving group (Figure 1D); and (iv) combinations of (i), (ii), and (iii).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%