2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.cattod.2008.09.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cobalt oxide supported on alumina catalysts prepared by various methods for use in catalytic afterburner of PEM fuel cell

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
20
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
2
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The corresponding shake-up satellite peaks for these peaks are centered at 781.1 eV [26]. The peaks at 796.9 eV are because of a chemical shift of the main spin-orbit components, because the cobalt cation on the nanocrystal surface chemically interacts with surface hydroxyl groups (-OH) [27]. The surface cobalt loading on RM led to the formation of Co 3 O 4 on the surface.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The corresponding shake-up satellite peaks for these peaks are centered at 781.1 eV [26]. The peaks at 796.9 eV are because of a chemical shift of the main spin-orbit components, because the cobalt cation on the nanocrystal surface chemically interacts with surface hydroxyl groups (-OH) [27]. The surface cobalt loading on RM led to the formation of Co 3 O 4 on the surface.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…This means that an almost equal portion of the alumina's surface sites is negatively charged (acidic sites) and thus available to the adsorption of the positively charged Ni species. Moreover, as the deposition of the Ni(H 2 O) 6 2þ ions onto the alumina surface causes a decrease in the pH of the suspension, we fed the pH control system with a suitable amount of the NH 4 OH solution (i.e., to keep the pH at 7.0) [50]. However, it can be said that following the modified-EDF methodology, the deposition of NiO x species on the alumina takes place mainly via adsorption of [Ni(H 2 O) 6 ] 2þ on the negatively charged surface sites.…”
Section: Differences Between the Catalysts' Synthesis Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar XRD patterns were observed for both 10CoAl-ME and 10CoAl-IMP ( Figure 2A) with intense lines assigned to the CoAl 2 O 4 spinel phase, crystallized in a cubic structure (2θ = 31°, 36°, 38°, 44°, 56°, 59° and 65°) and characteristic lines of the Co 3 O 4 phase, crystallized in a cubic phase (2θ = 31°, 3°8, 51°, 56°, 58°, 67°). NiAl 2 O 4 spinel was already observed in the case of nickel supported on alumina [46] and the Co 3 O 4 phase was also observed in the case of Co supported on Al 2 O 3 prepared by IMP and ME [47,48]. For the IMP cobalt sample, another peak at 2θ = 39° was observed, which was attributed to CoO.…”
Section: Catalysts Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 84%