Coccolithophores 2004
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-662-06278-4_5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coccolithophores and the biological pump: responses to environmental changes

Abstract: SummaryCoccolithophores, which are considered to be the most productive calcifying organisms on earth, play an important role in the marine carbon cycle. The formation of calcite skeletons in the surface layer and their subsequent sinking to depth modifies upper-ocean alkalinity and directly affects air/sea CO 2 exchange. Recent work indicates that the productivity and distribution of coccolithophores are sensitive to CO 2 -related changes in environmental conditions, both directly through acidification of sur… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
322
0
11

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 296 publications
(334 citation statements)
references
References 84 publications
(123 reference statements)
1
322
0
11
Order By: Relevance
“…Phytoplankton species that are able to enhance their CO 2 supply by CCMs (Raven, 1991) may exhibit no or minimal sensitivity to CO 2 enrichment (Raven and Johnson, 1991;Rost et al, 2003;Giordano et al, 2005). Others, such as the coccolithophore Emiliania huxleyi, respond to CO 2 enrichment with an increase in primary production (Rost and Riebesell, 2004). This suggests that the efficiency and regulation of CCMs differ among phytoplankton functional groups and species.…”
Section: A Engel Et Al: Co 2 Increases 14 C Primary Productionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Phytoplankton species that are able to enhance their CO 2 supply by CCMs (Raven, 1991) may exhibit no or minimal sensitivity to CO 2 enrichment (Raven and Johnson, 1991;Rost et al, 2003;Giordano et al, 2005). Others, such as the coccolithophore Emiliania huxleyi, respond to CO 2 enrichment with an increase in primary production (Rost and Riebesell, 2004). This suggests that the efficiency and regulation of CCMs differ among phytoplankton functional groups and species.…”
Section: A Engel Et Al: Co 2 Increases 14 C Primary Productionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CO 2 limitation of diatom growth has been shown in some species (Riebesell et al, 1993), but not others (Goldman, 1999), whereas carbon fixation by E. huxleyi has been shown to be limited at current atmospheric CO 2 concentrations (Rost and Riebesell, 2004;Riebesell et al, 2007). Phytoplankton growth is generally regarded to be CO 2 -saturated in the modern ocean, however (The Royal Society, 2005), and the small size of eukaryotic picoplankton would appear to militate against CO 2 limitation as the explanation for the positive response of Micromonas-like prasinophytes to high CO 2 /acidification reported here (Raven, 1991).…”
Section: Diversity Of Form I Rbcl Sequencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Coccolithophores fix CO 2 into organic matter by photosynthesis, contributing to the drawdown of atmospheric CO 2 (Raven and Falkowski, 1999). Calcification, on the other hand, releases CO 2 in the short term (Rost and Riebesell, 2004) and stores carbon in coccoliths in the long term (Sikes et al, 1980;Westbroek et al, 1993). In addition, coccolith ballast can accelerate the removal of organic carbon from upper water layers and aid long-term burial of carbon (Ziveri et al, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%