1981
DOI: 10.1130/0091-7613(1981)9<592:cimtin>2.0.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coconuts in Miocene turbidites in New Zealand Possible evidence for tsunami origin of some turbidity currents

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Active collisional margins like those of Japan and Chile offer those ideal conditions, but tsunami-related turbidites are not known from these regions. An intriguing geological example, however, has been reported from the seismically active accretionary margin of New Zealand, where coconut shells in Miocene turbidites have been postulated to be a likely tsunami effect (Ballance et al, 1981). Although other high-energy processes can conceivably transport normally buoyant littoral debris to such depths (Murty, 1982), it seems likely that the presence of terrestrial debris within turbidity current sediments ought to represent a key criterion by which one may recognize tsunami-induced offshore sediments produced as a result of offsurge tractive flow.…”
Section: Tsunamites Along Tectonically Active Marginsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Active collisional margins like those of Japan and Chile offer those ideal conditions, but tsunami-related turbidites are not known from these regions. An intriguing geological example, however, has been reported from the seismically active accretionary margin of New Zealand, where coconut shells in Miocene turbidites have been postulated to be a likely tsunami effect (Ballance et al, 1981). Although other high-energy processes can conceivably transport normally buoyant littoral debris to such depths (Murty, 1982), it seems likely that the presence of terrestrial debris within turbidity current sediments ought to represent a key criterion by which one may recognize tsunami-induced offshore sediments produced as a result of offsurge tractive flow.…”
Section: Tsunamites Along Tectonically Active Marginsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Bralower et al, 1998;Lawton et al, 2005). Clearly, a key question to be resolved by tsunami studies is how the marine Table 1 Generic diagnostic criteria of offshore palaeotsunami deposits, summarized from the following sources: (1) Ballance et al (1981), (2) Takashimizu and Masuda (2000), (3) Massari and D'Alessandro (2000); (4) Cantalamessa and Di Celma (2005); (5) Le Roux and Vargas (2005); (6) Fujino et al (2006); (7) D. R. Tappin ( pers. comm.…”
Section: Impact-related Tsunamiitesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The depositional signatures indicate that tsunami tidal waves struck the area. Dawson and Stewart (2007) summarized generic diagnostic criteria of offshore palaeo-tsunami deposits from different sources (Table 6; Ballance et al 1981 (Salem 2000) and Di Celma 2005; Le Roux and Vargas 2005;Fujino et al 2006;D. R. Tappin, personal communication).…”
Section: Geophysical Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ballance et al (1981) reported finding coconuts in Miocene turbidites and suggested that they may have been transported offshore by tsunamis, the same events that probably triggered the turbidity currents. Fossil forms that normally grew attached to a substrate may occur as disoriented, broken, and abraded individuals or as hydraulically accumulated shell beds, suggesting storm-wave activity.…”
Section: Paleoecologymentioning
confidence: 99%